College Recruiting Is Nothing More Than A Guessing Game
![]() |
| Where would the internet have ranked Bo Jackson in 1982? |
By Jay Coulter
jccoulter@gmail.com
With national signing day just a few weeks off, it’s hard to avoid all the hype. It goes without saying that recruiting is easily Auburn’s second most popular sport behind actual, on-field football.
Jeff Lebo can only dream about getting this much attention from Auburn fans.
I’ve never bought into all the recruiting hype. Don’t get me wrong, I follow it pretty closely. I realize the importance.
I also know there’s no possible way to accurately rank recruiting classes across the country. Rivals.com and Scout.com do a good job of profiling these athletes – and a lot of times they are spot on. And a lot of times they miss wide right.
In the end, it’s just a forecasting game. Your local meteorologist has a much better chance of predicting the weather a week from now, than a recruiting expert does of sizing up the talent of a private school tight-end.
Many of you will remember back in the late 1980’s a quarterback by the name of Billy Ray. He was rated by many as the top player in the nation. His picture was on the cover of every recruiting magazine in the country.
With much fanfare, he signed with Alabama and was quickly compared to Namath and Stabler. Needless to say, Ray never became anything in college. He would later go on to finish at Duke and become a trivia question for college football fans.
The same can be said of Alan Evans. Back in 1982, he was the hottest running back in the state of Alabama and coveted by every school from coast-to-coast. Pat Dye landed him and fans went crazy. He was the player that would return Auburn to its glory days.
That same year, Auburn also signed another pretty good running back. He didn’t have the numbers Evans did and didn’t get near the attention. But in the end, he turned out to be a pretty fair player.
You may remember him – his name was Bo Jackson.
Phillip Marshall did some quick research on his blog the other day that was telling. Looking at this year’s New England Patriots roster, he discovered that 15 players on the team played for small colleges.
I did the same research with the New York Giants and found that they had 14 players that played at lower levels.
How did the recruiting services miss these guys? It’s simple. You can’t compare apples to apples in high school football. How can you really say that a defensive back in South Alabama is as good as another defensive back in Portland, Oregon?
Furthermore, how can you rate a player higher than 150 others who all face different levels of competition?
You can’t.
So when you see Florida, Georgia, Alabama and even Auburn ranked among the nation’s best in college football recruiting, take it with a grain of salt.
How many players on this year’s Louisiana-Monroe team were recruited by Alabama or LSU.
How many South Florida starters got recruited by Auburn, Florida or Florida State?
A lot of times what sits on top of a player’s shoulders is more important than what is below it.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well done
Good article. Friends of mine who represent other SEC teams keep 'crowing' this time of the year about how in two years they will be national contenders because of the strong recruiting class. "It's not the size of the tiger in the fight, but rather the size of the fight in the tiger", is what I tell them.
The recruiting companies that rank these athletes are skewed. I've seen it personally up close when I use to be a H.S. football coach. For example, Notre Dame is interested in a kid named Golic. Well, if ND wants him, he must be good, so let's rank him high. When in fact, he's Mike Golic's kid and so ND is willing to burn a scholarship because, well, he's Mike Golic's kid. This is some of ND's problem's by being a 'homer' when it comes to recruiting. As an aside, Joe Montana's kid is also playing for ND. Roll out the 'red carpet' for ND's newest recruits - they have more star power than fire power.
No thanks, I'll take the hard nose, under ranked, middle to lower class kid who has been fighting for things all his life. Football seems to be easier for those kids. It's all about perspective. In the end, if a H.S. coach will beat the bushes for a kid who has raw talent and get some videos out and work on the basics of visiting campuses, and the scholastics of the whole deal, then he has about as much chance as anyone else and he will probably produce the same results as say, Mike Golic's kid. It's all about which program better develops the athlete after they have arrived on campus.
Also to keep in mind: the population explosion that we've face in our great country also affects these venues of life. The population growth and popularity of American sports has more kids playing than ever which creates a bigger pool of talent and with only so many scholarships available, we see why the USFs and App. States are becoming much stronger. Therefore, this, I believe is why you see some D1AA and Juco athletes in the '08 Super Bowl.
More quality schools means more upsets. I believe in the future we will see more schools making the jump from D1AA to D1A, which will call for expansion or creation of new NCAA conferences and hopefully bring about some kind of playoff.
It's all coming together...
Sums it up for me...
Your opinions mirror my own, Jay. First, I'm not a big 'hype' kind of guy. Your arguemnts about the ratings of these guys are right on. It boils down to opinion, not fact. There are few direct comparisons to be made.
I try not to really concern myself with the recruiting until it's done. Until the last few years when I've started going to CFB sites, it really didn't matter to me. I always thought, "I'll learn about them when they play".
I remember the first whiff of recruiting woes I ever heard, in early 1987. Fellow students were very upset that this storied RB out of Pensacola didn't sign with us. Some kid named Emmitt Smith.
Glad our defense always showed Emmitt some love when we'd play...
by War Eagle Atlanta on Jan 24, 2008 12:07 PM CST reply actions
Recruiting
Well written, and so true. I seem to recall Pat Dye saying, and I'm paraphrasing here, something like "I don't care if a recruit has five stars or not, I'd just as soon have a stable of 3 and 4 stars who have heart"...anyone else remember hearing that, or something similar?
Anyway, you can't coach hustle and you can't coach heart, and in the end that's what makes a player, and a team, great.
by borntru2au on Jan 24, 2008 1:57 PM CST reply actions
Thanks for the kind words...
Former Georgia coach Ray Goff would have five national championships if recruiting meant as much as the services would have you believe.
Jay

by 














