Perception vs. Reality
Chris Todd is slinging the rock!
War Eagle, everybody! We're now officially through the first third of the 2009 college football season, and every team in the SEC has now played at least 4 games. It's been an eventful season so far, and one of the more prevalent themes this year, has been "perception." How is Auburn, (or any team) and the league perceived, around the country? The answer for the league in general, of course, is "pretty darned well." With three teams in the top 4, and 7 in the top 25, the pollsters are showing the SEC some love!
There has been widespread griping from many corners, till this week, about Auburn not being in the top 25, but I think it's been understandable. After last season's melt-down, Auburn wasn't really on anyone's radar. Auburn's early schedule, with the exception (possibly) of West Virginia, was not impressive, to the national voter. The Mountaineers haven't helped matters, by playing down to the level of every team they've faced, so far. Auburn got the attention of the pollsters by beating Tennessee in Knoxville. "Wait," you say! "Tennessee isn't that good!" Tennessee, as the second-best SEC team over the past 20 years, has a reputation. Yes, this is a down year for the Vols, but UT did slow the Florida juggernaut down. That made Auburn's win, and continued offensive fireworks notable to voters nationwide. The game being on the main ESPN channel didn't hurt, either!That's why Auburn vaulted all the way to 17th "I tellya, we don't get no respect!" As bad as some folks think Auburn had it this year, 5-0 Wisconsin STILL isn't in the AP top 25! If the Badgers played 2-2, 19th ranked Oklahoma right now, I'd sure pick Wisconsin!
Another widely held perception is that "Arkansas/Houston Nutt has Auburn's number." A trip to Fayetteville always elicits worry from the Auburn fan base. I suppose that the 34-10 beatdown in 1999, and the 42-17 meltdown in 2001 are indelibly etched in Tiger minds. Those WERE two of the worst performances in the Tuberville era, but the idea that we always struggle in Fayetteville is just plain wrong! Auburn has 5 wins, 2 losses in Fayetteville, all time. In 1993, in the ice and snow, Auburn rode fullback Reid McMillon to a 31-21 win. In 1995, the teams played in Little Rock. In 1997, Auburn dominated the Hogs for a 26-7 4th quarter lead, before Clint Stoerner and Arkansas came roaring back. Auburn still won, 26-21. 2003 saw Gene Chizik's defense choke the life out of Matt Jones and the Razorbacks, 10-3. In 2005, Kenny Irons ran wild, and Auburn won going away, 34-17. In 2007, it was the Will Muschamp D shutting Darren McFadden and Felix Jones DOWN, for a 9-7 win. See? Auburn doesn't do that badly, in Fayetteville! The only game that wasn't competitive was the 1999 one (Tuberville's first year, Ben Leard concussion, no running backs, etc.), in which our doors were blown off. The 2001 game went into the 4th quarter at 21-17, and was a dogfight. Unfortunately, we could do nothing but turn the ball over in the 4th quarter, directly leading to 21 Razorback points. I certainly think Auburn will be competitive, this year in Fayetteville!
With most SEC teams having now played a couple of league games, let's revisit my net yards per pass statistic, and see how it correlates to the standings. That stat subtracts 50 passing yards for each interception, as you'll recall. Below are the SEC teams, as they are currently ranked in the standings, along with the starting quarterback. It's amazing how relevant that number is, so far.
|
SEC Eastern Division |
Record |
Record |
Starting |
Net |
|
Team |
SEC |
Overall |
Quarterback |
Yards per Pass |
|
Florida |
2-0 |
4-0 |
8.7 |
|
|
Georgia |
2-1 |
3-2 |
6.3 |
|
|
South Carolina |
1-1 |
4-1 |
6.0 |
|
|
Kentucky |
0-2 |
2-2 |
3.1 |
|
|
Tennessee |
0-2 |
2-3 |
3.3 |
|
|
Vanderbilt |
0-3 |
2-3 |
3.5 |
|
SEC Western Division |
Record |
Record |
Starting |
Net |
|
Team |
SEC |
Overall |
Quarterback |
Yards per Pass |
|
LSU |
3-0 |
5-0 |
6.4 |
|
|
Alabama |
2-0 |
5-0 |
8.7 |
|
|
Auburn |
2-0 |
5-0 |
Chris Todd |
8.6 |
|
Ole Miss |
1-1 |
3-1 |
4.6 |
|
|
Mississippi State |
1-2 |
2-3 |
4.4 4.3 |
|
|
Arkansas |
0-2 |
2-2 |
8.5 |
Generally, teams with a quarterback who has a rating of 8 or better have done very well. Guys with a 6.0 or so are OK, and those in the 3-4 range haven't done so well. The biggest anomalies in this table are LSU and Arkansas. LSU is still unbeaten, despite Jordan Jefferson's mediocre rating. And Arkansas is currently last in the west, despite Ryan Mallett being ranked among the leaders. Mallett was well ahead of everyone else early, but playing Kirby Smart and Joe Kines defenses has brought his number down. By this metric, Auburn's Chris Todd is currently ranked 3rd in the league, slightly behind McElroy and Tebow. We'll revisit this statistic several more times this season, and see how well it matches up with team success.
One perception that I had last Saturday night amazed me. How long has it been, since Auburn forced a good defense to play cover-two, most of the game? We've had at least one safety camped out in the box against our offense, for over a decade. Saturday, Tennessee respected Auburn's deep passing threat, and kept both safeties back most of the game. Those bombs to Zachary, Adams, and Fannin in earlier games, paid dividends against the Vols. It is a WHOLE lot easier to move the ball, if the opponent has to double cover both of your wideouts! Hats off to Terrell Zachary and Darvin Adams! They occupied 2 Tennessee defenders each, and allowed us to move the ball underneath. With 7 blockers, a quarterback and a runner, you can get a LOT done against 7 defenders.
This Saturday, I think everyone is looking for a big offensive day for both Auburn and Arkansas. The weather should be sunny, with a high in the upper 50s. Arkansas has brand-new artificial turf in Reynolds-Razorback stadium, and it should be a fast track! We'll have an open thread up early Saturday morning, here at TrackEmTigers.com! War Eagle, and let's beat the Hogs!
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
Everyone
is looking for a score fest out of this game, a la Arky and Jawja, but I think the Auburn D will clamp down Mallett and Petrino. They don’t have the rushing attack like we do to go with if the pass is shut down.
by War Eagle Atlanta on Oct 8, 2009 11:26 AM CDT reply actions
Speaking of Perception vs Reality
Can anyone shed any real light on the perception that Auburn O-line plays dirtier than other SEC schools? Have our coaches addressed this issue?
WAR EAGLE
Maybe you've read this already, but incase you did not...
by Jumpn_JackFlash on Oct 8, 2009 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions
I have - thanks
It is still hard to seperate fact from opinion. The difficulty is in judging “intent” and “malice” based on flagged plays in the heat of battle. Because of Pugh’s “history”, though not statistically significant to say the least, many in the blogosphere as caliming Auburn has institutionally condoned (and even encouraged) dirty play. Others taut Auburn as the leading offender of these abuses. I don’t buy that at all and wonder what the coaches (who are being demonized on this issue) have to say.
WAR EAGLE
It would be quite a task to compile a list of chop block penalties for each school (or even including pro teams) to try to compare their frequency
Can you find penalty stats anywhere?
It seems Auburn leads the SEC, FBS, and probably the world in chop block penalties. Hopefully Chizik won’t put up with that crap.
I can tell you this, Auburn comes to Baton Rouge in two weeks and it is the first game back since the Dorsey incident. There will be more than a few references to Auburn’s line play in the Baton Rouge media, and I’d bet money that LSU has talked about this issue with the SEC officials especially since the Dorsey incident went unflagged. All that to say, I’m pretty sure the officials will be looking for Auburn to screw up in that game.
The BS was propagated by Bammers and Corndogs.......
the first incident involving Ziemba and Chaz Ramsey in 2007 was an assigned cut block and Ziemba, then a freshman, failed to cut his man standing up on Ramsey’s man (Dorsey) instead causing Ramsey to Chop instead of Cut. Cut blocks are legal Chop blocks are not……the only difference is you can legally block below the knees if the man is not engaged with another player. Corndogs will still whine over it and Bammers will still proclaim AU as dirty……when all is said and done its not taught by anyone not the previous staff and not this one. And no there is no stat for chop block penalties that I have ever been able to find. The second incident was in the Peach Bowl if I am not mistaken and was flagged. The whole accusation that AU plays dirty is based on two plays and is foolish and petty by any standards for any fanbase.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
You are forgetting that it happened in the vandy game in 2007 also.
That’s 3 times in ‘07 and once in ’09 plus the dirty hit that wasn’t a chop block in 08 vs bammer.
You're right Jonno
LSU is sparkling clean and Auburn is just really dirty. Of course, Auburn is the only team to chop block in America. And, LSU never does anything wrong.
Oh wait a minute
I cannot forget about the fantastic fans that your beloved institution claims as a following either. I mean they would NEVER DO ANYTHING that might make people think a little negatively about the following around LSU.
It was the 08 Vandy game......
and 4 penalties spread over 3 years is hardly evidence of dirty play…..not to mention two completely different coaching staffs. I’m not forgetting squat its still a big to do about nada and you know it.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Am I the only one who's more worried about this game than I was about Tennessee?
"You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." - Jeff Francouer
I seriously doubt it. This game scares me more than the thought of playing LSU, UGa, or Ole Miss just because of the individual matchups.
by Jumpn_JackFlash on Oct 8, 2009 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions
Nope
I am too
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Oct 8, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree w/ jd is legend
This is a very dangerous game for us. Of course, every game from here on out is dangerous for us. But this one is as bad because its at the beginning of a real tough stretch for us and we badly need this win. Arkansas matches up very well with us. So, I’ll watch this game very nervously.
War Eagle
May the injury gods
continue to smile upon us
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Oct 8, 2009 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions
We’ve looked at the numbers and the offenses compare fairly even.
But our defense is appreciably stronger than theirs.
Plus we force turnovers, protect the quarterback, and don’t throw interceptions. We have the leading field goal kicker in the SEC. And we will spin their heads around when we go into light-speed mode.
Have no fear. They can’t kill us. It’s in the rule book.
Not to be bolstering J Crompton or anything
But where do you get the 3.3 yards per pass for him? I’ve got him at 6.0 yards per pass, far as I can tell. 11.0 per completion.
I got punk'd by UT's Athletic Department.
doh
Didn’t read the – INT bit. That is way too harsh on INTs, in my opinion.
I got punk'd by UT's Athletic Department.
It may be harsh but its.....
applied to them all and therefore fair.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
It's rare....
….for an interception to really equal a punt, i. e. the 40 net yards a team would have obtained otherwise. Ints kill drives, pump the other team up, put the D back on the field early, and cost a good bit of field position. A fair chunk of picks are returned for touchdowns, which is a double-whammy, big loss of field position, AND a potential 14 point swing. 50 yards is an attempt to be a total penalty, not just a strict yardage measure.
Well
I just think it might be a bit harsh, considering sometimes INTs aren’t that bad. A bit too generic in my opinion, like saying “We’re always going to give you the worst thing” but I do understand the thought. It also way hurts those who had a bad game — or, uh, Career….. yeah I’ll stop defending him now. But at least he managed no INTs against Auburn! Woo!
I got punk'd by UT's Athletic Department.

by 
















