Oh, What Might Have Been!
War Eagle, everybody. It's time now for the Acid Reign Report on the 2009 Iron Bowl. I'm of two minds about this game. Honestly, I think we should have won this game, but a few mistakes held us back. However, there is no questioning that Auburn put forth a superhuman effort. If Coach Gene Chizik and his staff can summon forth that sort energy in future Iron Bowls, we will do well!
In my keys to victory post 10 days ago, I said that the Tigers needed to chiefly do three things: run the ball, stop the run, and play turnover-free. There was a little bit of success running. Auburn stopped the run emphatically. Turnovers were costly. Both Chris Todd turnovers, a fumble and an interception, set up Bama field goal attempts. Leigh Tiffin honked one of those wide right, but the other was good, pulling Alabama within 1 point. Had we not had those turnovers, Wes Byrum might have been attempting a 54 yard field goal at the end to send it to overtime. I like Byrum's chances a lot better than a Hail Mary! Auburn also gave up avoiding kicking to Javier Arenas, and that cost Auburn. A 56 yard punt return set Alabama up at the Auburn 33, which resulted in another field goal. We'd have been better off punting it out of bounds for no gain, on that one!
The Tigers came out with a wide-open offensive game plan, utilizing all sorts of misdirection plays, reverses, double passes, and swinging gates. The scheme really slowed down the Alabama pursuit, and forced them to attack more than they wanted. When Alabama started crowding the line, that opened up the Auburn passing game. Unfortunately, the Tigers did not do a good job of taking advantage. Tommy Trott was doing such a good job blocking on the corner that Tide defenders were avoiding being in the same zip code with Trott. We tried several slant passes to Trott, and missed them all. We had a number of opportunities to get running backs loose on screens, but didn't pull the trigger till 3rd down, when Bama was sitting back in zone coverage. We managed to burn Alabama's corner blitz package with an out and up for a 72 yard touchdown, but never tried it again. Alabama secondary members totaled 5.5 tackles for loss. There was opportunity to throw over them, but we could not do it.
Special teams had a few good plays, but were not very good, overall. There were multiple kickoffs out of bounds, multiple fumbled punts, short punts, and line drive punts. We let Javier Arenas get 3 returns, and he burned us for 102 yards on those. The few bright spots were a successful onside kick, 2 punts killed inside the 20 by Clinton Durst, and 99 kick return yards on 4 kickoffs.
For the first time all season, Auburn utilized a run-blitz package, and it paid dividends! Bama was forced to operate from the shotgun and try mostly short passes. When you've held Alabama to 73 rushing yards, with a first year linebacker and two first year safeties, you've done really well! With good pressure, Greg McElroy avoided the costly turnover, but he was forced into drive-killing bad throws. I'd say defensive coordinator Ted Roof called a brilliant defensive game plan, except for one play. On third and nine from the Auburn 33 in the second quarter, we went with a safety blitz and left a linebacker in man coverage with Colin Peek. That decision resulted in an easy Alabama TD pass. You just don't call safety blitzes on 3rd and long! ESPECIALLY if you're going to hand an all-SEC tight end off to a linebacker to cover!
Unit Grades, after the jump.
Defensive Line: A. There is little to find fault with, here. Auburn had their best day of the season, up front! Antonio Coleman and Antoine Carter both proved that they could sacrifice personal glory and stats, to play great contain on the Alabama running game. When it was an obvious passing situation, Coleman took James Carpenter and Drew Davis to school a few times. The tackle-end twist worked well too, with Nick Fairley able to turn the corner on Bama tackles. Mike Blanc and Jake Ricks stoned the Bama line, and plugged the middle. Points off on one Jake Ricks offside penalty.
Linebackers: B+. This might have been the best game of the season for the linebackers. It certainly was, against teams with a pulse! True freshman Jonathan Evans stepped up and did not back down against Heisman Trophy candidate Mark Ingram. Bama ran it right at Evans and Evans responded with 8 solo tackles! Josh Bynes was a force, with ten total tackles. Points off on Craig Stevens vs. Bama's Preston Dial, Brad Smelley, and Colin Peek. Bama blockers mostly handled Stevens. Points off also on Josh Bynes letting Peek loose for a second quarter touchdown. Bynes should have never been put in that situation, though.
Secondary: B. Auburn did a good job in two deep zone, taking the long pass away from Alabama. The Tide did try to force a couple into coverage, and both Walter McFadden and Neiko Thorpe responded with pass breakups. Run support from the whole secondary was good, but not great. On Alabama's last drive, the safeties got played a bit. The big 17 yard catch and run on the screen to Trent Richardson was on the safeties. Bates barely hung on at the ten. The fullback on the game-winning touchdown was Washington's man. As you might expect, that was a difficult adjustment to ask of a first year player.
A note on the Auburn defense this season: When Gene Chizik first arrived in Auburn in 2002, he had a very talented defense to work with, including future pro stars Carlos Rogers, Carlos Dansby, Dontarrious Thomas, Reggie Torbor, Spencer Johnson, and Jay Ratliff. Still, it took awhile before those guys "got it." We were diced pretty badly, in the first half of the season, including giving up record rushing yards to Arkansas at home in a 38-17 loss. The light didn't really come on till late in the year, against Georgia, Bama, and Penn State. This year, Chizik and Roof have had to deal with a sub-par interior line, and a woefully thin back seven. Against Alabama, the light came on for this defense. There now seems to be some chemistry, and understanding of what the coaching staff wants. When the light came on in 2002, we were treated to some awesome defense for the next few years. For the 2009 Tiger defense, the light is now on again!
Punting: C+. If Clinton Durst had kicked every punt out of bounds for a 30 yard average, I'd have given the punting unit an A! Auburn did that early on, but in the second half they gave Javier Arenas some chances. Overall it was a solid performance. I hated giving up the 56 yard return, but we are hardly the only team Arenas has done that to! We ended up averaging a mediocre 40 yards per punt, with only a 31.6 yard net. Two punts killed inside the 20 helps this grade.
Punt Returns: D-. On five punts, dropped two on the ground. I pass this unit only because Auburn got both bobbles back. Priority one in the offseason is recruiting, priority two is finding and grooming a new quarterback. But I'd say that next on the list is finding a punt returner. This has been the worst year for Auburn punt returners EVER. We've had some bad years before, but nothing like this!
Kick Returns: C. Demond Washington averaged 24.8 yards on four returns. If that stat is compared to team averages this season, Washington would be tied for 3rd in the SEC. Not bad, but against the last-place kick coverage team in the league, I had hoped for more.
Kickoffs: B. Morgan Hull kicked deep 3 times, and two of them went out of bounds. Against Javier Arenas, that's a favorable result. I'm surprised Bama didn't make us kick it again, on those! The two out of bounders gave Bama the ball at the 40. When we DID kick it to Arenas at the goal line, he returned it to the 46. Should have kicked all three out of bounds! The Tigers had a perfectly executed onside kick. It was brilliantly conceived, with the team acting lackadaisical, and not even lining up before Byrum suddenly just bunted that ball, and raced with it. It caught Alabama totally off-guard. That cat's out of the bag, I think. We won't be able to catch anyone else on that for at least five years!
Placekicking A+. Wes Byrum continued a near-perfect season by hitting all of his extra points. Byrum finishes the season having converted 14 of 15 field goals attempts, and 100% of his extra points. Magnificent!
Offensive Line: B+. It wouldn't be an Auburn football game without a Lee Ziemba false start. At least he got it over with in the first quarter. Ziemba had a pretty good day blocking on Lorenzo Washington and Brandon Deaderick, as did Andrew McCain. The two Tide ends combined for only 4 tackles, none for a loss. Auburn had less success dealing with Alabama blitzers. Eryk Anders was particularly elusive, racking up 3.5 tackles for loss, and 3 quarterback hurries. The Auburn line basically held their own, but didn't generate much push. Nearly all of Auburn's successful running plays were on trick plays to the outside. Pass protection was decent, most of the time.
Receivers: A. You can't ask for much more than these guys produced. They had great downfield blocking, no drops, and got a lot of separation on a very good Bama secondary. The greatest failure in this game was not utilizing these guys more. Both Darvin Adams and Terrell Zachary looked FAST against the Bama secondary.
Running Backs: C. Ben Tate ran hard, as did Onterrio McCalebb, but that's about all you can say. Great catch early for a touchdown, by Eric Smith. Blocking was quite poor, in this one. The only times the backs slowed Tide defenders down was when Ben Tate picked up a holding call. Mario Fannin bobbled a screen pass away that had the potential to go for a long TD. This might have been the worst day by the backs all year. Bonus points for no fumbles. Still, we needed a LOT better production blocking.
Quarterback: C-. Auburn had a plan to exploit the Alabama defense. When it moved to phase two, and we had to hit some short passes, we couldn't. Chris Todd had some nice downfield throws to Darvin Adams, but none to any other outside receivers. Terrell Zachary can run down the field all alone, and Todd will never look his way. Todd completed a decent amount of screen passes, but these were usually on third and long, and ended up well short of the first down. Todd missed the slant to Tommy Trott three times way high, ending up with an interception on the last one. Todd missed the quick hitch three times. Todd had a sack-fumble. Sack-fumbles are somewhat excusable from the blind side, but Todd was hit from the front. Sometimes a QB just has to fall down and eat it. After the first quarter, Todd kept us in the game with the 72-yard pass to Adams, but did very little beyond that. A half dozen better throws would have given Auburn a double digit win over the Tide.
I hate losing to Alabama, make no mistake about it. At home, it's an even more bitter pill to swallow. This one is easier than the last two Iron Bowl losses in Jordan Hare, because we appear to be on an upswing with our program. This is a game a more experienced Auburn squad might have dominated. It also makes one wonder where we'd be if we had played like this against Arkansas, against Kentucky, against LSU. Carrying the momentum over will be a challenge for the returning players and coaching staff.
My hat's off to Alabama. They got a lot more than they bargained for on this road trip, but they didn't panic. They didn't turn the ball over, and they didn't give up. Perseverance gave the Tide their second perfect regular season in a row. I think the Tide folks also know that they'll need a LOT better performance in the SEC Championship game, if they are to defeat the Gators.
It will be an exciting bowl and off season, for Auburn, but we must temper our expectations with realism. As Pat Dye said last week, next year's team won't be much better than this one. Problems will have to be worked on, and newcomers brought in that will play immediately. Nowhere will Auburn be hit harder by graduation than on the defensive line. The loss of Antonio Coleman and Jake Ricks will be huge. The loss of Walter McFadden will be big, too. McFadden was a top-flight cover corner, AND a great leader. Auburn will be solid kicking the ball, but will have to find a new punter. Returns and coverage were an absolute mess this season, and should see a lot of work. The offensive line will have to replace a tackle, and the replacement of seniors Tommy Trott, Ben Tate, and Chris Todd will not be easy. The quarterback race will be critical. Unless Kodi Burns makes a dramatic comeback, we'll be starting a green QB, next fall. If we learned nothing this season, we know that Malzhan's offense is heavily tied to quarterback play.
War Eagle to all, and have a great finish to Thanksgiving Weekend!
--
0 recs |
46 comments
|
Comments
Good News Acid, we should be good at punter...
Steven Clark, the number one rated punter, is an Auburn commit. Along with Cody Parkey, the number one place kicker. So, in theory we should do alright replacing Durst.
by war damn philly on Nov 28, 2009 12:57 PM CST reply actions
We don't have to replace him with someone new.
We have Ryan Shoemaker who was an All-SEC punter before being sat for Durst.
I would be an Alabama fan too but I didn't go to Troy. Instead, I am an Auburn man because I went to Auburn.
Eh...
…..Shoemaker punted for Durst a couple of times last year, and it looked like he was hurt. Not sure about that.
Question for Acid Reign
Hey Acid, good analysis as usual, of what was a heartbreaking loss.
You obviously cover the team and players very closely. My question is, who on this team do you foresee making All-SEC? I would think Tate, Adams, and maybe an O-lineman (who?) on offense, Coleman, McFadden, maybe Bynes/Stevens (which, if either?), on defense, Byrum on special teams. What do you think, am I close?
Good question!
…..I think Coleman is a lock, since he was leading the SEC in sacks coming into this weekend. He MIGHT slip to second team. Auburn’s players have the handicap of playing for the SEC’s worst defense, statistically.
…..McFadden is possibly second team. My gut tells me he might end up behind KY’s Sam Maxwell, and LSU’s Patrick Peterson. Either of Bama’s corners could slip in there, depending on how well the cover in the SEC Title game.
…..Darren Bates is definitely on the all-freshman team.
…..Sorry, I think Bynes and Stevens are very average, for SEC linebackers.
…..Byrum has had a great year, but other kickers have too. Byrum only got to try 15 FGs, because we’re so good at getting TDs. Before today’s games kick in, Blair Walsh (UGA) is 16-17, Daniel Lincoln (UT) is 9-10, Spencer Lanning (SC) is 15-17, and Leigh Tiffin is 27-31. It will be close.
……All we ever notice on O-line play is the false starts, but aside from that, Lee Ziemba has been pretty darned dominant he’s a 2nd team pick, at the very least. Ryan Pugh has a chance at center, probably 2nd team.
…..Darvin Adams will finish with 10 TD receptions, but there are at least 6 guys ahead of him in catches, including AJ Green, Shay Hodge, Brandon LaFell, and Terrence Tolliver. Honorable mention, at best.
…..Tate finishes behind Mark Ingram and Anthony Dixon, and Montario Hardesty has a chance to catch Tate, with a good showing against KY. I’m not sure how you keep Dexter McCluster out of the conversation, even though Houston Nutt wasted him for half a season. My thinking is that Tate will be 2nd team All-SEC.
…..Chris Todd will finish behind Ryan Mallett and Tim Tebow.
Another
Question… I felt like we had a whole lot of trouble with the blitz this year. With the camera angles that they show on TV its hard if not impossible to see what the receivers are doing. In short, with this offense it doesn’t seem like we ever audible slant routes in short yardage situations or when the defense looks like its going to blitz. To me, all our plays look and feel like they take a good deal of time to develop which makes itself painfully evident when teams are throwing the kitchen sink at us. Is me, Todd, receivers, Scheme? Could adding quick slants help?… are they there and I’m missing them?
As always great analysis Acid and thanks to all the contributors for another great year….
Hating Lowder since 1993.
The slant pass...
……looks like the easiest thing in the world, when you see it executed on TV. I guess we’ve got Bill Walsh, Joe Montana, and Steve Young to thank for that! They just slanted folks to death with that, some 25-20 years ago.
…..In reality, it ain’t so. It requires timing, vision, and a huge amount of guts and toughness by the receiver. Furthermore, defensive linemen are coached against the slant. If a team is 3 step dropping, and throwing slants, you rush with your hands up. In short, use the slant too much, and you’ll be throwing it through the trees, in the SEC. Furthermore, a dropped linebacker can mean a pick-six on those.
……So what do other electric offenses do to handle big blitzes? The quick hitch is a better (safer) option. The really good offenses have automatic checks to it. You need multiple “hot” receivers, though. We’ve been zeroed in on Adams too much. The keys are the QBs arm, AND the receiver’s hands. Then you’ve got your jailbreak screens, and then your max-protect schemes. It’s kind of difficult to max-protect when you’ve got a lot of folks spread out. Todd doesn’t have the Dan Marino quick release. SEC defenses are so fast that a ball popped up out there slowly is a pick-six waiting to happen. Malzhan has opted for deeper routes, to try and keep the secondary out of the box, to help the running game.
……To throw those short route/quick passing things, there is a LOT of timing involved. How much practice time does the coach want to commit to it? Too much time, and you won’t be able to run the ball effectively. A good running game takes reps, too.
…..In my opinion, we’ve had less trouble with the blitz this year, than any this decade. We’ve gotten a LOT of big plays out of failed blitzes. This year, we’re averaging 32.91 points per game. That beats ANYTHING out of the Tuberville era, even 2004 and 2005. That’s the best score since 1996’s 33.16. And that 96 squad benefited from 21 points in OT vs. Georgia. Take those out, and you’ve got 31.4 in regulation.
almost perfect article.
I agree with everything except that last paragraph. it sounds like you’re making too big of a deal of our losses. Walt McFadden and Antonio Coleman will be the toughest losses. Jake Ricks did a good job but Fairley and Clayton will do a fine in his place. Coleman will only be replaced if someone steps up big time, but i think we’ll manage. The loss of Walt McFadden might not be felt if a couple of our injured D-backs make a comeback. Savage probably gets a another year of eligibility and McNeil, who was to become a terror in the backfield coming out of high school, will be back from injury(Hopefully). Etheridge is very questionable, but maybe he’s the next Tez Doolittle. If one QB steps up, shows he can make the necessary throws and can avoid turnovers then we’ll have our new QB. Losing Big Ben will be tough, but i think Mario Fannin can do a great Job in his place. Eric smith will take over Fannin’s current job on the team. replacing Todd and Coleman will be challenging, but if next year’s team is not better than this year’s then i will be disappointed.
We don't know...
…..what’s really going to happen. I’m speculating, of course. What I CAN assure you, is this: some folks we are counting on won’t make it. Via injury, academics, or whatever, there will be a few that don’t come through. Also, a few folks you’ve never heard of will step up and have big years.
…..Think back to last December. What if I told you that we’d have a linebacker, and two safeties start in the Iron Bowl, that weren’t even with the team? What if I told you that Darvin Adams and Terrell Zachary would be our starting receivers. And Chris Todd the QB? Would you have believed that we’d ring up 300+ yards and 21 points in the Iron Bowl?
…..Senior losses are big. There’s no substitute for that leadership and experience. That’s true of all teams.
I think the most crucial loss from the senior class is.......
McFadden. Solid cover corners are hard to come by, and while we were lacking depth primarily due to injury in the defensive backfield and that should not be the case next season, his skills and his leadership will be missed. Antonio Coleman is our most skilled defensive player, just eeking out ahead of McFadden, but Antoine Carter is ready to fill his shoes and demonstrated as much in the past few weeks after finally getting healthy. I can say the same about Fairly on the interior of the D-line, he is going to be a force to be reckoned with. All in all I disagree with Dye (no surprise there for some of you I’m sure) I think that AU will be much improved next season. The majority of the improvement will be on defense as Acid has suggested but I also believe that the offense will show significant improvement if for no other reason than being in the same system for a second year and because Malzahn knows how to utilize the talent he has to take advantage of the strengths available.
As far as the game……I am upset, pissed off, and down right miserable over it, but…..I am also very proud of our Tigers. They played with more heart and emotion than I have seen out of an AU team in a very long time. Our defense was absolutely amazing and they outplayed their counterparts on the opposite sideline. In the end it was not running out of gas from the defense that cost us the game…..it was Bama’s execution on the final drive. We may have gotten to McElroy with the blitz had we tried but we may also have given up the huge play…..I’m not going to second guess Roof or Chizik on this. McElwain called the plays to take advantage of our defense’s biggest weakness and that was the short pass underneath the coverage with linebackers and safeties left to cover their best reciever and we couldn’t do it. We were so close I could taste it. But one thing is certain, whether they will admit it or not, the Bammers know the gap between us is not as big as they wished or deemed it to be. War Damn Eagle.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
You should've made this a FanPost!
I agree completely. After the game I, and every other AU fan in JH, cheered so loud when the team was walking back into the locker room that we completely drowned Bama’s band out. It was great. I think every fan knew then, and knows, that things are going to be great in the next few years.
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
So when you are a program like Auburn
I know there are no such things as moral victories.
But holy hell what a game you guys played. Congrats on the season.
Tubbs goes 5-7 with this team and loses 35-3 to Bama.
I agree Jonno
I do not believe in moral victories either, but Chizik is a great coach. He had our boys ready. Tubs as bad as I hate to say it just lost his fire.
If you are a War Damn Eagle, you can War Damn anything.
what!?
I don’t believe Tubbs lost anything, He’s a genius football mind no doubt about it. think about it, 2008 was supposed to be the beginning of a dominant era. Not because of Tony Franklin, but because his 06 and 07 classes were his most talented by far. A coach doesn’t lose his fire in one season, in 08 AU had a deep and talented team and somehow everything happened wrong. i still think Tubbs has it and once he finds a new job he’ll take his team as far as they can go.
I agree with everything except for the genius part......
a genius wouldn’t have hired Tony Franklin. That being said I’m still not sure that Franklin wasn’t thrust upon Tubs by the “Powers That Be” as the one to hire……..the whole thing is smelly from Franklins hiring to his firing to the complete debaucle of Tub’s fire-signation. It doesn’t take 3 days of meetings with Jay “The Buffoon” Jacobs to decide you don’t have the desire to start over and Jay Jacobs certainly doesn’t pay out 5.1 Million in buyout money because its the right thing to do……seems more along the lines of Tator Tot’s hush money to me. I don’t think we will ever know the truth.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
I think
The only reason he hired Franklin was because the university pressured him into getting a spread type offense. At the time he was thought of as a great candidate for ant OC job so I would not put any of that on Tubs.
It's just very fishy that he got him.....
from a program that has so many ties to Lowder and Dye….don’t forget that Blakney took alot of the heat for Dye during the Ramsey debaucle and how amazing it was that Blakney landed the Troy job so soon after the whole mess. Kind of a Manchurian Candidate type scandal theory for sure but not as far fetched as you might think.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
no
not that it’s not appreciated and i know i don’t speak for anyone but myself, but why would congratulate a 7-5 season. this season was by all measures a disappointment.
Not at all
seeing as that every game last year was heart-wrenching to watch and there was no production what-so-ever. I would say this year was great considering a new staff, same players, and a recruiting class that was built within just a couple of months.
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions
I hear you
Hope you didn’t try anything gay with Joe while we were at the game
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 7:49 PM CST up reply actions
That I completely disagree with.....
disappointing that we didn’t win two games that we should have….UK and UGA? Yes. But prior to the season with all of the doom and gloom predictions most would have been extremely happy with 7-5. I myself predicted a worst case finish of 7-5 and I am not disappointed for several reasons. We are improving, our recruiting is back to where it should be and our coaching staff is doing a good job on and off the field. Now if in 2011 (not 2010) we aren’t competing for the west then yes it will have been a disappointment.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Jonno, I'm curious ...
Last year AU was 4-2 with Tony Franklin at OC and Chris Todd at QB; and was 1-5 with that “not-so-genius-football-mind” brain trust of Hugh Nall/Steve Emsfinger at OC and Kody Burns at QB.
Assuming the Tuberville/Nall/Emsfinger regime was still in charge for the 2009 season — which 5 games do you have the Tigers winning? (and who do you figure would have been the brain trust’s starting QB?)
Thanks.
Well you have to consider the teams they were playing against.
But if your saying my prediction of 5-7 with Tubbs was too generous, I’m more than happy to drop it to 3-8 or whatever you like. I’m not a Tubbs fan.
I'll give it a guess!
…..Tub would have hired yet another coordinator, and wouldn’t have stuck with “Nallsminger.” If Tub hadn’t left, Chizik wouldn’t be here, and Rhodes would have stayed. Having the same defensive system might have helped a bit.
…..With a new offensive system, and the embarrassment of 2008, you HAVE to think the staff would make a better effort to mesh. Would it equal what Malzhan/Taylor/Luper/Grimes did this year? Likely NOT!
…..Sure wins: La Tech (they turned out to be pretty crappy.), MSU (they were awful on both sides of the ball in game 2.), Ball State (2-10 record), and Furman.
……Shocking wins (Tub was always good for a couple of these when Auburn was an underdog): Tennessee (Crompton was bad enough for 3 quarters against us. It could have been worse!), and maybe Georgia. Tuberville would have gotten slammed by Nutt’s Rebels. That happened WAY too much, the last ten years. We’d have beaten Kentucky, most likely.
…..End result: 5-7, maybe 6-6 at best.
You can add.....
Powers and Blackmon to the defense as well and maybe even Marks. You can also add back several of the players that Chizik gave the boot to prior to the season starting. I don’t think we would have been worse off record wise personally…..but we will never know.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Here is my argument against Dye's comments.
I think Auburn will be much better next year as a team. We move Washington and keep Thorpe as starting corners, McNeil and Bates will be tough at safety, Carter, Goggins, Bonamolo, Equea and Ford will be rotating around at ends (not to mention if Sanders comes in the spring and gets locked in), and Fairley, Blanc and Clayton with Thorton and Whittaker if they come will be solid at tackles. Our outlook on defense looks to improve for us. The new linebackers will give us much needed depth and blitz abilities. My main concern is whether we can find two or three more corners to fill this class to give us depth there.
On offense, Trotter, Rollison and Moseley will be fighting for quarterback and in my opinion, Smith and Dyer will be fighting for halfback. I think Fannin stays as a utility slot guy with McCalleb and adding Reed with them. We will be loaded with talent at receiver, now they just need to continue to get better and play to it. Offensive line will add help too but will they be ready for the SEC?
I think our offense and defense will both be better next year, unfotunately, South Carolina will be good, Kentucky will be better, Miss State will be a lot better, Clemson will be a pain in the butt and Bama will be better. So while we will be better, so will the rest of the SEC and our record might not show that we are better.
I would be an Alabama fan too but I didn't go to Troy. Instead, I am an Auburn man because I went to Auburn.
There is some potential there.
…..Still, that first year starter thing at QB is a big deal, in the SEC.
Here is my argument against your argument.
Pat Dye was a successful SEC coach.
Mattco is a message board poster.
Trovon Reed is supposed to be a helluva punt returner
Hope he is
And, in a related story, this week marked the 5,000th performance of the Broadway musical "Cats." It also marked the 5,000th time a guy turned to his wife and said, "What the hell is this?"
Better
I don’t think we’ll have as many problems next year. I think Neil Caudle will fill Todd’s shoes for his Senior year, and after that Tyrik Rollinson could be ready. I don’t know about you guys, but I’m not going to miss Tommy Trott too much. Phillip Lutzenkichen (if that’s spelled right) should be fine, if not better. Tate is a tough loss, but come on, this is the Running Back U. Hopefully we can hold on to Michael Dyer, and he and McCalebb can become the next Canrell and Ronnie. Hopefully. Eric Smith and Fannin are still going to be those all-around players that will catch/block/run. We aren’t losing any recievers worth losing sleep over, I think Brent Celek is leaving. If all of the freshman recievers like Benton, Emory Blake, and Travante Stallworh start making plays along with T-Zac and Adams, they should be better than this year easily. Kodi Burns, I couldn’t be prouder of that kid. We lose McCain on the line, but one lineman should be replaceable. The rest of the line should be pretty nasty next year. Coleman is obviously the biggest loss in my mind, offense or defense. Antoine Carter and Goggans, plus others need to step up. I think Nick Fairley will fill Rick’s shoes with no problem, although we need to recruit some big’uns. I’m psyched about our linebacking corp, with Evans playing so well and nobody leaving for the NFL. Hopefully we can stay healthy and just get some more bodies on the field. As for our secondary, we had 2 GOOD safeties on the field against Bama and they might not start next year. Mike McNiel hopefully can make it back, even though Savage won’t. Neiko Thorpe has to get better and I think they should move DeMond Washington back to corner to fill McFadden’s spot. Wow that was a lot. As you can see, I’m looking forward to the future of Auburn football! WAR EAGLE!!
savage isn't coming back?
Why are you so sure Savage isn’t coming back?
Because he's a fifth year senior who's applying for sixth year eligibility.
Not saying he won’t make it, but just saying the average return percentage is very, very low
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
Savage will recieve a sixth year under medical hardship if he chooses to apply.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Brent Celek? That cat's in the pro's
No pun intended. But I think Dontae Aycock will do really well after redshirting this season, too. I think Dyer and Fannin will be a serious dual threat next season and I really think Trotter will be our starter. I think he would’ve been this year if it wasn’t for the knee injury.
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions
I think the RB position is the least of our worries....
it wouldn’t shock me at all, and in fact I kind of expect, to see Eric Smith take over as the primary power back. Fanning Has proven to valuable as the “Jack of all trades” back and will probably return as such next year. As far as QB, it wouldn’t shock me to see Trotter, Caudle, Rollison, Mosley, or Burns for that matter, get the job….if anything having so many who can challenge for the job should push all of them to excel. And no I don’t think Trotter would have been the guy this year without the inury….but thats a what if that we will never no the answer to. And last but not least who the f*ck is Brent Celek?
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Haha!
Brent Celek played at Cincy! I can’t remember what position but I know he plays for the Eagles now…I don’t know why autiger12 threw that one in there?
by auburn tigers on Nov 29, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions
PS
Forgot some stuff. Couldn’t be prouder of the way the team fought in the Iron Bowl, and what Chizik done with what was a broken team last year. The big difference was that Ole Miss Game. If not for that incredible effort, we’d be singing the same song as loast year. Instead of lying down and playing dead, the team rallied, even though we should have beaten UGA and possibly Bama. I thyought Chizik was an iffy hire at first, but I knew he’d be good once I saw the staff he went and got. And to every person at the Bama game that chanted “ITS GREAT TO BE AN AUBURN TIGER” afterward, I’m right there with you.
Nice article AR
I hope folks temper their expectations until we see how a first year Qb performs.

by 














