Best Back in the State--And The Conference
by War Eagle Atlanta on Dec 1, 2009 6:19 AM CST
9 comments
The final regular season SEC conference stats are in and the one we were all interested--best running back--has been decided. Bear in mind that the rushing leader isn't determined by total rushing yards, it's yards per game. Anthony Dixon of Mississippi State missed the first game against Jackson State, so he only had eleven games total, giving him a slight edge in YPG over both Mark Ingram and Ben Tate. It's academic anyway, given that Jackson State was the first game out of the gate for MSU and Dixon would have certainly padded his stats there.
While Tate and Ingram were dueling it out in the Iron Bowl, Dixon not only caught up with Ingram, but Montario Hardesty of Tennessee snuck past Tate to take third place in the SEC. I think it's certain though that if both Auburn and Alabama were interested in padding rushing stats, they would have given more carries to both backs in the late-season scrimmages against Furman and Chattanooga.
RUSHING Cl G Att. Yards Avg. TD Long Avg/G 1. Anthony Dixon-MS SR 11 257 1391 5.4 12 70 126.5 2. Mark Ingram-UA SO 12 221 1429 6.5 12 70 119.1 3. M. Hardesty-UT SR 12 264 1306 4.9 12 43 108.8 4. Ben Tate-AU SR 12 243 1254 5.2 8 60 104.5 5. D. McCluster-UM SR 12 147 985 6.7 6 79 82.1 6. Derrick Locke-UK JR 11 177 843 4.8 6 31 76.6 7. T. Tebow-UF SR 12 193 796 4.1 13 55 66.3 8. Warren Norman-VU FR 12 145 783 5.4 3 58 65.2 9. J. Demps-UF SO 12 95 729 7.7 7 62 60.8 10. Charles Scott-LS SR 9 116 542 4.7 4 34 60.2
0 recs |
9 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Dexter McCluster is the best RB in the SEC
Houston Nutt is certifiably insane for not using him more earlier in the season
And, in a related story, this week marked the 5,000th performance of the Broadway musical "Cats." It also marked the 5,000th time a guy turned to his wife and said, "What the hell is this?"
by jd is legend on Nov 30, 2009 11:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree that McCluster
is a great RB, but I don’t think that with his small frame he would have been able to hold up all season if they used him. While I agree that Nutt is stupid for not using him more earlier in the year, I believe that he would have gotten injured by the pounding that RBs take in this league.
If you are a War Damn Eagle, you can War Damn anything.
by WarDamnZach on Dec 1, 2009 7:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
yards per attempt
The most telling stat IMO. Ingram has over a yard on Dixon and Tate.
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
by Zoltar on Dec 1, 2009 8:52 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think that attest to his offensive line being so good.
I really would like to see his numbers with lesser talent then i think the “truer” numbers will show
AUBURN is back!
by auskip07 on Dec 1, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well
Ingram’s yards after contact has been well covered every time we play
I mean, he had the least carries of the top 4
Terrence Cody eats your field goal!
by Wallacewade04 on Dec 1, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thats really a flawed stat
Really its the angle of the contact that really makes the difference. The offensive line can affect a defenders angle and of course its easier to break a tackle from a bad angle.
AUBURN is back!
by auskip07 on Dec 2, 2009 7:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bowl predictions
Where do you think the Tigers will end up playing their bowl game?
by Disinterested Par-tay on Dec 1, 2009 8:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think both Ingram and tate are being undersold.
If you look at the stats against SEC opponents:
Ingram – 166 att., 1030 yds, 7 TDs, 6.2 YPC
Dixon – 191 att., 1016 yds, 8 TDs, 5.3 YPC
Tate – 179 att., 924 yds, 6 TDs, 5.2 YPC
Hardesty – 187 att., 857 yds, 9 TDs, 4.6 YPC
by rugman11 on Dec 1, 2009 4:47 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
Related FanPosts on Track Em Tigers
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
