Track Em Tigers: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Alabama Sanctions Finally In

Time_served_medium

Free at last? Well, not quite...

After being leaked yesterday, the findings of the NCAA investigation into the University of Alabama's self-reported textbook scandal are finally in. There are no scholarship losses or post-season ban in any of the 16 sports involved in the investigation, which centered around 200 different athletes. Instead, Alabama will be forced to vacate victories in select sports where ineligible athletes participated, including some football games from the 2005, 2006 and 2007 seasons.

As a repeat offender, the University will remain on probation for an additional three years. Of all the athletes investigated, 125 were found to have unintentionally violated the textbooks policy, which generally meant that the value in each case was under $100. Only 22 athletes were found to be intentional wrongdoers, with 14 coming from the track team, 7 from football and 1 from tennis. The monetary amount of the violations ranged from $32 on the low end  to almost $4000 on the high end. Alabama will also have to pay a fine to the NCAA of almost $44,000.

Although the NCAA considered heavier sanctions against Alabama, they praised the school for coming forth on their own. It is entirely possible that the penalties would have been much more severe had the violations occurred in a single sport as opposed to be spread out in all sports across the board.

Poll
The sanctions handed down to Alabama today:
A) Seem about right
146 votes
B) Too severe
80 votes
C) Not nearly strong enough
211 votes
D) I'm riding the fence today
22 votes

459 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 8 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

mmmm....

Seems to me that it would have been more severe since the infractions were spread out through out the entire athletic dept. Its leads to a greater failure to monitor. Although if it was just one sport then its more like turning a blind eye to that particular sport. Mmmm, NOt sure on that one really. Maybe i am on the fence about being on the fence…..

by Paratiger on Jun 11, 2009 3:45 PM CDT reply actions  

My opinion

I think alot of it is because of Satan being there. If it was Shula still there it would have been a lot worst.

by tigertracks on Jun 11, 2009 6:30 PM CDT reply actions  

You serious?

Please. I’m surprised they’re even vacating the victories. This whole thing seemed like not that big of a deal to me.

I've got one foot on the platform, the other foot on the train
I'm going back to New Orleans, to wear that ball and chain

by jd is legend on Jun 11, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree...

…I thought the penalty was too harsh. If Bama goes on 3 year probation and vacates 21 wins for a textbook scandal then Southern Cal deserves the death penalty. But we all know nothing will come of that. Its bull.

by auburner on Jun 11, 2009 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

That statement is in a word,

retarded.

"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum

by GumptownTiger on Jun 12, 2009 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Vacated wins......

does not amount to a hill of beans…..there are not many bama fans that will suffer because of vacated wins. The 3 years of probation and 5 more years of the “repeat offender curtain” is the most damaging and even that is no big deal as long as they keep their nose clean. This is basically a big slap on the wrist with a warning of real punishment if they screw up again. The NCAA could not let Bama off with nothing but a warning and this is about as light as it gets as far as sancions go considering the repeat offender status.

I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU

by Todd92 on Jun 12, 2009 10:01 AM CDT reply actions  

If that was Auburn

,,,what do you think would have happened?

by James4au on Jun 12, 2009 10:26 AM CDT reply actions  

I honestly believe.....

that were it Auburn or any other school that were not already on probation……the penalty would have been less severe provided that school cooperated fully and proactively the way that Bama did with the NCAA.

I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU

by Todd92 on Jun 12, 2009 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Track'em Tigers. Auburn's number one sports blog.
Start posting about the Tigers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tyson_baby_small
Who's the best player in each conference?
Small
Oil in the Gulf, Part II and Final
Dsc00843_small
Arkansas State Prediction Thread
Beasly_sullivan_small
It's the Final Countdown!
Small
Newsflash: Bowden Forced Out at FSU
Small
2010 Auburn Intro Video
Auburn_miror_small
Auburn Football 2010
8d_small
2010 Auburn Preview (TheAuburnKnight)
Dcp_0227_small
FREE Auburn Channel from Auburn Eagle
Beasly_sullivan_small
2010 Schedule W/L Pick 'Em Right Now!!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Utah running back Eddie Wide (36) works to break free from Pittsburgh's Max Gruder (55) and Jarred Holley (18) during the first half of an NCAA college football game Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson)

Utah Upsets No. 15 Pittsburgh In Opening Night Overtime Thriller, 27-24

HONOLULU - SEPTEMBER 2:  Ronald Johnson #83 of the University of Southern California Trojans runs in for a touchdown against Corey Nielsen #8 of the University of Hawaii Warriors during first half action at Aloha Stadium September 2 2010 in Honolulu Hawaii. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images) +2 updates

Lane Kiffin Is Victorious In Debut, No. 14 USC Wins In A Shootout At Hawaii, 49-36

South Carolina quarterback Stephen Garcia, left, celebrates a first-quarter touchdown with South Carolina tackle Kyle Nunn, center, and South Carolina guard Rokevious Watkins, right, during the first half of their NCAA college football game against Southern Mississippi, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010, at Williams-Brice Stadium, in Columbia, S.C.  (AP Photo/Brett Flashnick) link

South Carolina Rolls Over Southern Miss, Wins 41-13

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Headshot_small Jay Coulter

Gg45_small War Eagle Atlanta

Acid_reign_small Acid Reign

Img_8384-3_small aubtigerman

Au_flag_ii_small WarDamnZach

Dcp_0227_small KoolBell777