History Says Chizik Has A Chance
So how's Gene Chizik going to do? It's a question I'm asked at least twice a day lately. I'm sure you get the same thing. We've heard it now for nine months. Two Saturdays from now, the Chizik era finally begins.
So how do you answer that question? When you think about history it's really easy. Success at Auburn is defined by how you do against Alabama. The same goes for the guy in Tuscaloosa. Using that as the measuring stick, the odds look to be long for the new guy on campus.
Never mind the controversy surrounding his hiring. Even without the drama, history says Chizik will have to come from behind - and quick. Can it be done? Not only can Auburn come from behind, history tells us it has already been done.
Looking at the Alabama program today it's hard for even the most optimistic Tiger fan to see Auburn overtaking Nick Saban anytime soon. Following an undefeated regular season, nationally ranked back-to-back recruiting classes and a preseason top five ranking heading into 2009, it seems like a decade ago that Auburn won six in a row.
As mismatched as the two programs appear now, they are nothing compared to the perceived differences heading into the 1993 season. Alabama was coming off a national championship year under Gene Stallings and Auburn was replacing arguably its most successful coach in school history in Pat Dye. To make matters worse, Auburn was beginning another round of NCAA probation that kept them off television and ineligible for bowl play.
And how can we forget the hiring of Division I-AA Samford coach Terry Bowden. He made his Jordan-Hare Stadium debut a year prior when he brought his Bulldogs in for a 55-0 whipping and a big payday. Looking back, there probably should have been similar outrage to what we saw in December with Chizik.
Sixteen years ago, Auburn fans were much like the fans of today - hopeful, yet realistic. Dye finished his career 1-4-1 down the stretch in 1992 including a 17-0 loss to the eventual national champions at Legion Field. A six win season would have been viewed as a step in the right direction on this day in 1993. Had the internet been around then the media would have buried Auburn before the ground thawed in early March.
We know the rest of the story. Bowden would lead Auburn to an undefeated season, a 22-14 win over Alabama and a number four national ranking at year's end. Three seasons later Stallings was gone and Bowden managed a .500 record against a coach regarded in the same light as Saban is now.
So while the divide between Auburn and Alabama looks big today, history says neither program is ever terribly far apart. On paper this season, like it did in 1993, Alabama looks to be near unstoppable. Auburn's use of the term, "rebuilding" looks generous at best.
Chizik knows what he has to do to be successful at Auburn. He has to not only win, but reestablish Auburn as the dominant program in Alabama. Doing that means beating his cross state rival more than he loses to them.
As the clock at Pat Dye Field begins its countdown to the 2009 season, the career of Gene Chizik will be decided like those who've preceded him. There can only be one team on top in this state. Chizik is officially on the clock.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice article
Dye left the program in pretty good shape and I think Tuberville did also. The most obvious difference is depth, but some of the issues were the result of how he left, while others were due to an unusual attrition rate. This year is going to be interesting. I can see an 8-4 or 9-3 season, but if the injury bug hits, I could also see a 4-8 season. It will be a show.
Dye left some players,
…..but we had depth issues in 1993, too, especially at linebacker! As starters, you had a pair of true sophomores who had played some, as true freshmen. (Anthony Harris and Terry Solomon.) To START, in the middle, they found a previously unknown WALK-ON sophomore, to plug in there. (Jason Miska) That was the STARTERS. For depth, there was converted fullback Joe Frazier, who backed up the strong side. True freshman Derrick Robinson backed up Miska, and true freshman Marcellus Mostella backed up Solomon, at least until he broke his arm in game 7. Hey, at least in 2009, we have two veteran starters back, right?
…..Secondary was a mess. We had one good man-to-man guy, sophomore Calvin Jackson. The other guy, Fred Smith, blew out a knee and was lost before the season. Had to move safety Chris Shelling to corner. That left basically no significant experience at safety. We moved a tailback (Otis Mounds) to one slot to start, and found an unknown sophomore to play on the other side. (Brian Robinson)
…..Wide receivers: We had Sanders and Bailey returning, and nothing else. Walk-on Shaun Carder and true freshman Willie Gosha were the 2nd team.
I remember Miska being a wrecking ball.....
and having no regard for his body in hitting people. He turned out to be a solid LB.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
I also remember
“Feet” being of a very unpleasant disposition – I never cared for him personally when I saw him around CDV extension (he seemed to live over there in the parking lot playing pick up hoops when he was not practicing football) or when he’d try and crash the fraternity parties. But… he was a hell of a player and had the heart of a lion on the field.
Crashing Fraternity Parties...
Well, I can’t say as I blame him. Fraternities at Auburn never treated my friends and I any better than you would a mangy dog you don’t want at your front yard. Plus, this would be at places other than parties. So, if he was making fraternity parties lose their luster, all the more power to him.
It was around 87 or 88 I think.....
that the IFC and the University made the Frats close their partys. At the time it was seen by most as absurd……someone correct me if I am wrong but I think it was because of the kid at the Phi house that ended up dying of alcohol poisoning that was the final straw. Before that anyone and everyone was welcome at most Frats party’s with some exceptions such as socials. Although I was still welcomed at a particular house for most events…..most of my stoner friends were gone by this point and I didnt care to go though. The difference between AU an UA on the greek scene was a major factor for my choosing AU……my brother was putting the hardsell on me to follow him to UA, but between academics and the better than thou atmosphere of his frat, I knew AU was the better place. At AU it didn’t matter if you were greek or GDI you could party with whomever you chose to do so with…..at Bama I saw greeks (my brother included) treat GDI’s as pariahs and second class citizens. That was a huge turnoff.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Well...
I am glad they treated you so well. I cannot say the same for what happened with me. That doesn’t diminish my love of Auburn don’t get me wrong. I’m just saying some personal experiences I had really turn me off of that sort of thing in general.
The point being...
that after the Frats were forced to close their party’s, which ended the open door policy that most had, the culture and attitude changed somewhat to what you experienced.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU

by 














