Airmail That Thing!

Chris Todd trips, and shovels the ball to Ben Tate for a 27-yard gain!
War Eagle, everybody! Today's post will take a look at returning SEC quarterbacks, and their chances in 2009. As usual, a few stars return, and a whole lot of guys hoping to step up. Few would argue that Tim Tebow is one of the best in the country, and it's pretty certain that big numbers will be expected of Jevan Snead and Ryan Mallett. Beyond that, it's a slate of guys that had questionable stats, limited starts, or both.
It's been argued in numerous places in the past, that if you're going to pick one stat (other than wins and losses), as an indicator of a team's success, it would be "net yards per pass." (Google that quote, if you'd like to read more on the logic.) To figure net yards per pass, take passing yards, subtract out 50 yards for each interception, and subtract sack yardage. Divide the result by the number of passing attempts. The interception penalty is a sort of a median guess as to how much field position an interception costs a team. Since interceptions and sacks kill drives, they are important.
Whether a team runs to set up the pass, or passes to set up the run, net yards per pass is an important stat. A high rating indicates a preponderance of big plays, which leads to high scores. A low rating indicates that defenses can pack it in close to the line of scrimmage, and stifle the offense. Even a predominately run-oriented team must be able to be a threat passing, to have success. The two teams that threw least in 2008, Florida and Alabama, ended up in the SEC Championship game. However, their yards per pass stats were 1st, and 4th, respectively. Let's look at the results from 2008:
East
|
Team |
Net Yards Per Pass |
Opponent |
SEC Division Finish |
|
Florida |
8.0 |
2.2 |
1st |
|
Georgia |
7.5 |
4.6 |
2nd |
|
Vanderbilt |
2.4 |
3.0 |
3rd |
|
South Carolina |
2.9 |
3.5 |
4th |
|
Tennessee |
3.7 |
2.9 |
5th |
|
Kentucky |
3.6 |
4.7 |
6th |
West
|
Team |
Net Yards Per Pass |
Opponent |
SEC Division Finish |
|
Alabama |
5.3 |
3.7 |
1st |
|
Ole Miss |
6.0 |
4.1 |
2nd |
|
LSU |
3.9 |
5.2 |
3rd |
|
Arkansas |
4.4 |
5.1 |
4th |
|
Auburn |
3.4 |
4.0 |
5th |
|
Mississippi State |
3.2 |
4.9 |
6th |
Some of the teams that finished highly in yards per pass, finished with mediocre records. Why? Because they gave up high net yards per pass to their opponents. LSU and Arkansas come to mind. The team with the poorest yards per pass average, Vanderbilt, actually won a bowl game. The reason? They finished 3rd in defending net yards per pass. 20 interceptions will always help your win column!
Teams that finish at 4.0 or better tend to sustain drives and score points. Conversely, holding an opponent below 4.0 keeps them from getting first downs, and keeps them off the scoreboard. With those concepts in mind, let's take a look at the career numbers for the returning SEC starters:
East
|
Team |
Quarterback |
Career Net Yards Per Pass |
|
Florida |
Tim Tebow |
8.6 |
|
Georgia |
6.6 |
|
|
Vanderbilt |
3.8 3.4 |
|
|
South Carolina |
3.5 |
|
|
Tennessee |
3.8 |
|
|
Kentucky |
3.9 |
West
|
Team |
Quarterback |
Career Net Yards Per Pass |
|
Alabama |
8.1 |
|
|
Ole Miss |
Jevan Snead |
6.3 |
|
LSU |
5.1 4.0 |
|
|
Arkansas |
Ryan Mallett |
4.6 |
|
Auburn |
Chris Todd |
4.4 |
|
Mississippi State |
4.9 1.4 |
Along with media favorites Tim Tebow and Jevan Snead, are some surprises: Greg McElroy and Joe Cox. The latter two haven't played as much, and one might be tempted to throw out the results because of insufficient data. I think you have to remember that the whole offensive team helps create the stat. With good talent around them, I think McElroy and Cox will do well, this year.
Where does this analysis leave Auburn? Chris Todd is currently ranked last in the West. Were Auburn in the East, Todd would rank 3rd. In the SEC overall, Todd finishes 8th. It's not all gloom and doom, though. Todd put up most of that stat with a bad throwing arm, and in a dysfunctional offense. And Todd still managed to beat out six quarterbacks on the list above! Just about every facet of the Auburn offense looks to have improved over the off-season, including a beefed up line, better receiver play, and a surgically repaired arm. While most quarterbacks improve with experience, we should see quite a jump for Todd, this year.
Another quarterback who should improve dramatically is Ryan Mallett, of Arkansas. Mallett compiled his stats as a freshman in Lloyd Carr's moribund Michigan offense. Under Bobby Petrino, Casey Dick finished 5th in the league last season. With a gun like Mallett has, the sky's the limit!
Some of the guys starting this year at quarterback will struggle. Much of that is due to new systems and suspect supporting casts. Jonathan Crompton's had to learn his 3rd college offense, and it's a fairly complicated West Coast scheme, too. Crompton's best deep threat, Gerald Jones, is out. Mississippi State is sorely lacking playmakers on the offensive side of the ball, beyond Anthony Dixon. The same could be said of Kentucky, South Carolina, and Vanderbilt.
Just think, folks! We've got one week left, just ONE WEEK, before the SEC season kicks off! I can't wait to be in front of my TV, for the Gamecocks' battle with N. C. State! It's going to be another exciting year!
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Another great analytical column. I was reading something like this the other day. I thought it was at smartfootball.com, but when I went over there to check, I didn’t see the article. That’s the trouble with reading twenty different sites about football on the net— the transitory nature of cyberspace. With books or magazines, I would have kept that article marked with a piece of paper between the pages for later reference. Oh sure, it would be in a stack of similarly dogeared articles, haphazardly strewn about. But in my mind’s eye, I would remember which stack, and somehow be able to retrieve it. But the internet article? Gone. The breadcrumb cookie trail lost to ethereal seagulls.
Numbers. Evidence. Usually, this kind of stuff leaves me feeling like I just got taken by a clever stockbroker. But this is one time I can actually see the truth. This stat is not counter-intuitive. Plus it plays into my personal concept of effective offensive strategy: Keep the defense guessing.
In this regard, we are fortunate to have Malzahn performing his magic sleight of hand. I’m more concerned about our defense this year than our offense. It’s not often you hear that said about Auburn football.
Great Read...
Acid, I like how you are a numbers guy. I like the numbers game, but I have always been a guts, and momentum type of guy. This type of post is one that I have not seen before and appreciate the work it took to gather that info. Although Todd and Mallett numbers could be skewed, I think that it still will show what sort of team they have. With that said, I think that both teams will be much improved this season.
If you are a War Damn Eagle, you can War Damn anything.
Richard Pittman
over at And The Valley Shook has also created his own QB index.
This is a link to a page that looks at SEC QB’s over the last 3 years.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com/2009/8/20/995693/atvsqbpi-past-is-prologue
Same type of data, rewards total yards, subtracts for sacks and pics. It’s all in how you massage the data.
Not trying to live in the pass but..
What was our Net yards per pass in 2004? i wonder how that ranked to the rest of the nation?
ALABAMA leading the NCAA with infractions since 1994
Intended or not
“live in the pass” is an excellent pun
"You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." - Jeff Francouer
by jd is legend on Aug 27, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions
2004
……We compiled a 8.11 mark as a team. Compare that to 2003, where we picked up 5.72. Worst year on the archives of the Auburn website? 1998! 2.63.
Over the years, the number of pass plays has continued to increase. If you saw Leatherheads, or follow the history of football, there were no pass plays during the early years of football.
Within the last twenty to fifteen years alone, we’ve seen the run:pass ratio go from about 70:30, to 60:40, and now it is approaching 50:50.
Maybe it’s because defenses have gotten so much more sophisticated, certainly fans got spoiled by the excitement of pro ball pass plays. But now offenses are having to put the ball in the air in a general ratio of 60 run:40 pass in order to win games. (I copped this notion from Chris Brown over at smart football since I am not a numbers guy.)
What I like about Acid’s article is how he examines two sets of data to account for major variables, i.e., offense pass production and defense pass protection. Now, the numbers are there in his chart, the order in which teams finished is listed. It seems to flow in direct correlation. Very insightful to see the connection.
Anyone know
how much playing time McElroy got at Alabama last year? Certainly not enough to make his 8.1 rating statistically credible, right?
Good job, Acid!
by War Eagle Atlanta on Aug 28, 2009 11:22 PM CDT reply actions

by 















