Homecoming 2009, Auburn hosts Furman
The Paladins were the foremost warriors of Charlemagne's court.
War Eagle, everybody! Time now for another 2009 Auburn Football opponent preview. November 7th is Homecoming at Auburn, and the Tigers are scheduled to host the Furman Paladins. Furman is a Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) team, and they play in the Southern Conference, along with such teams as UT Chattanooga, Samford, Western Carolina, The Citadel, and Georgia Southern. Furman is the school that produced current Vanderbilt head coach Bobby Johnson. Furman has not had a losing record since Johnson's 1998 squad went 5-6. Current head coach Bobby Lamb replaced Johnson in 2002. The Paladins were fixtures in the FCS playoffs during Lamb's first five seasons, but have failed to make the cut the past two seasons, finishing 7-5 last season, 4-4 in the Southern Conference. The Paladins return 11 starters, 7 on offense.
Last season, much like at Auburn, the Furman coaches decided to implement a spread offense. It was an attempt at a balanced offense, producing slightly more running plays than passes. Overall, the decision produced middle-of-the-pack Southern Conference numbers, but the results were uneven. Furman blasted some of the lesser teams on their schedule, such as Mars Hill, Colgate, and Chattanooga. Against better teams, the offense floundered; scoring only 7 against Virginia Tech, 10 against Elon, 14 against Appy State, and 10 in season-ending losses to Georgia Southern and Wofford. Furman returns an experienced backfield and receiving corps, and is bolstered at quarterback by the well-publicized addition of transfer quarterback Chris Forcier, from UCLA. Forcier will have his hands full trying to win the starting job, though. Senior starter Jordan Sorrells returns, and he's the son of offensive coordinator Tim Sorrells. A capable possession receiving corps also got a boost, with the acquisition of Tennessee transfer wide receiver, Tyler Maples. Maples has the speed to stretch the field, something Furman needed badly. The Paladins are excited about the talent they have on the offensive line, but the reality is that they lost 3 starters to graduation, including All-American tackle Joel Bell.
On defense, Furman was decimated by departures after last season. Only 4 starters return. Last season, Furman changed from a traditional 4-3 defense, to a 4-2-5 look, putting an extra defensive back on the field. The decision helped the defense shave about 10 points off their defensive average, and about 50 yards per game. The Paladins will try to regroup around senior tackle, All-Southern Conference performer Justin Brown. Also returning with experience is junior All-Southern Conference rover Max Lerner. For those of you who watched MTV's show a couple of years ago, "Two A Days," yes, that's the same "Max," from the Hoover Bucs. Lots of young players will have to step up on defense, and depth will likely be an issue, this season.
Furman returns capable kickers and punters, as well as good coverage units. The Paladins had success returning punts last year, but kick returns were poor. Short kickoffs plagued Furman, but good coverage limited opponent field position, for the most part.
Matchups
Auburn defensive line vs. Furman offensive line: This is a tough matchup for Furman. Though the Paladins have some talent, they are going up against the strength of the Auburn defense. Auburn's line should have some depth, and a very strong set of starters led by preseason All-SEC end Antonio Coleman. Furman returns two senior guards, 281-pound Heath Cockburn, and 268-pound Tyler Haynes. The other 3 starters will be new. The Furman line averages only 278 pounds, and that will be one of the lighter lines Auburn plays all season. Advantage: Auburn.
Auburn linebackers vs. Furman runners: Auburn will rely on veterans Josh Bynes and Craig Stevens, along with JUCO transfer Eltoro Freeman, and some very young backups. The centerpiece of the Paladin backfield is junior running back Mike Brown, a 5' 8", 190 pound fireplug. Brown managed 823 rushing yards last season, despite facing a lot of blitzing defenses attacking the Furman spread. Brown also caught 33 passes. There is depth behind Brown, too. At fullback, sophomore Tersoo Uhaa turned heads a year ago, with surprising blocking ability. Uhaa had 420 yards, and 8 touchdowns as a freshman in 2008. A defense can't ignore Furman fullbacks. Advantage: Even.
Auburn corners vs. Furman receivers: Against the better teams last season, Furman receivers struggled. Injuries early in the season hurt, and the Paladins used a lot of young players. Overall, a lack of a deep threat kept lots of defenders packed near the line of scrimmage. Auburn has the speed to stay with Furman, here. Walter McFadden and Neiko Thorpe should be in good shape against this crew. Furman returns their entire starting lineup from a year ago. These include junior Adam Mims (58 catches), sophomore David Hendrix (46 catches), and Sederrik Cunningham (33 catches). In addition, senior R. J. Webb returns after missing a year for injury. Tyler Maples, a sophomore transfer from Tennessee, will be eligible to play immediately, as well. Slight Advantage: Auburn.
Auburn safeties vs. Furman secondary receivers and quarterback: Auburn's Zach Etheridge, Michael McNeal, and Mike Slade all have experience, and talent. They'll be facing a variety of slot receivers, tight ends, and fullbacks from Furman. The most formidable of this group will be senior tight end Chris Truss. At 262 pounds, Truss can block like a lineman. He's got 32 career catches, and six touchdowns. There is almost no experience behind Truss, though. I'd bet on senior Jordan Sorrells to retain the starting quarterback job over transfer Chris Forcier, although Forcier and his 4.4 speed might be a good option for some Wildcat packages. Sorrells hit 60.9 percent of his passes last season, for a 6.9 yards per pass average, with 16 touchdowns and 10 interceptions. Sorrells isn't much of a running threat, tallying negative 27 rushing yards last season. Advantage: Even.
Punting: Clinton Durst brings his 42.1 yard average back for another season on the Plains. Furman's senior punter Trent Hawk averaged 40.9 yards. Junior return man Adam Mims handles punt returns for the Paladins, and he averaged 10 yards per return. Punters avoided Mims, for the most part. Out of 51 opponent punts, Furman only had 15 returns, and one of those was a block. Auburn is still unsettled at punt returner, although summer workout observations seem to indicate that Mario Fannin is the front runner. Furman gave up 7.7 yards per punt return to opponents, Auburn gave up 7.0. Advantage: Auburn.
Kickoffs: Auburn's Wes Byrum averaged about 67 yards per kickoff during the spring, and appeared very consistent during the A-Day game. Sophomore Chas Short handled kickoffs for Furman last season, averaging 58.6 yards per kick. Auburn's coverage gave up 21.5 yards per return, Furman's gave up 19.2. Last year for the Paladins, Mike Brown and Adam Mims returned most kicks, on a unit that managed only 17.0 yards per return. Auburn junior Mario Fannin is the most experienced kick return man, averaging 22.5 yards per return. Advantage: Auburn.
Placekicking: Wes Byrum returns for his third year for Auburn, having hit 27 of his 42 career attempts. Senior Mathew Cesari returns for Furman, having hit 9 of 12 field goal attempts last season, his first year as the starting placekicker. Advantage: Furman.
Auburn offensive line vs. Furman defensive line: Auburn will field a large, veteran SEC line led by junior tackle Lee Ziemba. Furman is small up front, by SEC standards, and will face a tough task getting by Auburn's big men. Senior tackle Justin Brown is a 3 year starter, and was All-Southern Conference last season. Sophomore Bryan Poole will likely be the other tackle. At end, Furman promotes two senior backups to starting positions, Kyle McKinney, and Shaun Van Rensburg. Advantage: Auburn.
Auburn backs vs. Furman linebackers: Auburn should have some weapons in the backfield, led by senior running back Ben Tate and junior H-back Mario Fannin. Furman lost both of their starting linebackers to graduation, and the new starters will be thrown into the fire with minimal backup experience. Projected to start are sophomores Kadarron Anderson, and Bryan Boykin. Advantage: Auburn.
Auburn receivers vs. Furman corners: Auburn leaders going into fall camp appear to be Tim Hawthorne, Montez Billings, and Darvin Adams. Signee DeAngelo Benton is reportedly turning heads in summer workouts. The Furman defense takes some hits in the secondary, with the loss of both starting corners. Particularly missed with be William Middleton, an FCS All-American who could literally take away half the field from most passers. A pair of All-Southern Conference Freshman Team corners are projected to start as sophomores, this year, Jordan Griffin and Ryan Steed. Advantage: Even.
Auburn secondary receivers and quarterback vs. Furman safeties: Senior tight end Tommy Trott should be solid, and junior Mario Fannin showed flashes in the slot. Hopefully, Auburn will have an established quarterback in place by game ten. Furman plays 3 safeties in the 4-2-5 defense. The returning star of the secondary is junior All-Southern Conference rover Max Lerner, who hits like a linebacker. The bandit position, essentially a nickel corner role, will be filled by veteran senior Julian Hicks. Furman appears ready to tap a redshirt freshman, Nathan Wade, as the free safety. Wade reportedly had a great spring. Auburn has a talent advantage in the receiver/defender matchup, and the freshman free safety should somewhat offset Auburn's quarterback woes. Advantage: Auburn.
As one would expect, Auburn appears to be ahead in many of the matchups, and as a FBS/SEC team, should be in better shape to weather the nicks and bruises of a long season, than a FCS team. Auburn enjoys particular advantages along both lines of scrimmage. Auburn will be coming off a tough slate of SEC games, though, and may be a bit down for this game. I think we all remember the team's struggles to put away Tennessee Martin, last fall! While Auburn may have issues at quarterback and receiver, as well as a lack of depth on the offensive line, Furman has a young defense. Auburn's defense should be fine against a Furman team that struggled to make big plays a year ago.
Prediction: Auburn hasn't lost a homecoming game since 1991, and it won't happen in 2009, either. Auburn cruises past Furman, 37-13.
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
I hope to be the first.....
to extend a hearty welcome to the Furman University Christian Knights and hope they enjoy our campus and hospitality.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Acid, you must really dislike our linebackers if you don’t even see them with an advantage over the Furman running backs. I agree our linebackers are not the best group we have ever had on the plains, but come on man. I am not expecting AU to be world beaters this year, but we are talking about Furman. I think you are giving the Paladins a little too much credit. I would be surprised if they have a back go over 50 yards on the AU defense.
by Jumpn_JackFlash on Aug 6, 2009 12:09 PM CDT reply actions
Linebacker...
…..scares me to death. Last season, if our line didn’t make the play, it was trouble. Put the tight end on Craig Stevens, and the other linebackers would be chasing it downhill. And our best two linebacker tacklers, Chris Evans and Merrill Johnson, are gone. Last season, Craig Stevens had only ONE HALF of a tackle for loss, all year. Josh Bynes had only 3 tackles for loss, all year. When your safeties lead the team in tackles, your linebackers aren’t getting it done!
But you must admit....
that the linebackers didn’t start the real slide in poor tackling until the defense had been worn down and decimated by injury. The things I am reading about Coach Yoxall’s Strength and Conditioning program the past few months makes me believe this group (at least the starters) will be not only better but out to prove that last season was a fluke.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Thats not true
They couldnt tackle from dqay 1. Look back at the MSU game.
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Aug 6, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Yaxall belw it
last year. he didnt have anyone ready to play. I hope you are right about him this year
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Aug 6, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
OK Gumptown I'll listen....
how do you equate 1 rushing first down, 66 yards gained with 28 more lost for a 1.3 yd per carry average as failure from the LB’s?
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Oh, I forgot to add....
the longest run by MSU that day was exactly 10 yards.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
b/c it's MSU
and i dont think they keep stats for missed tackles ( not that i can find anyway)
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Aug 6, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry dude....
Gotta call you out on this one…..
Tray Blackmon 6 tackles
Craig Stevens 4 tackles
Chris Evans 3 tackles
Josh Bynes 2 tackles
Merrill Johnson 2 tackles
and consideriing that MSU had a decent running game (Anthony Dixon and Christian Ducre are good backs) over all last season and the longest run was 10 yds against AU and the best drive was a whopping 22 yds I fail to see proof of your point in the MSU game…..I have watched it not just once but multiple times…..there were only 3 passing attempts longer than 10 yds and they were 13, 13, and 12. Perhaps your memory is tainted because of the misery that resulted from last years debaucle, but our defense was as good as most in AU’s recent history until the injuries and attrition took is toll on them.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Consider me put in my place on MSU
but we missed a hell of a lot of tackles last season.
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Aug 6, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry Gumptown......
its not just that my cups half full, its just that its half full g#@ #U$%Y!!!!!! and we should all have high expectations and dissappointment if its any less. We at the very least will find out how well Coach Tuberville recruited and how well Coach Chizik can coachem up……which For myriads more reasons I am more confident that Chizik can and will be a fine coach (I hope I’m right).
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
LSU's power running game plowed over Auburns LB's last year like bowling ball.
AU’s LBers are in trouble against teams this year like Bama, LSU, and Arky who will have strong power running games.
Again only after the Defense was worn down from having no help...
from the offensive side of the ball. There isnt a team in the country that can win consistantly with the kind of dissarray we had on offense last season and I’ll go one further……there isn’t a team on any level that has a defense that can stay on the field for as many minutes and constantly being put in horrible field position by the offense lack of ability to even move the ball and stay healthy.
This season will be different if the offense has moderate success. And the Defense will be the prime beneficiary.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
You guys go have a beer...
But Jonno is right. We weren’t very good against power runners like Charles Scott, nor really short, midget backs who wear a lot of oil on their uniforms.
by War Eagle Atlanta on Aug 7, 2009 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree 100%, our linebackers stunk it up at times last year. But I think that our athletes are much better than Furman’s athletes across the board. If the linebackers have an edge in any game this year, it will be this one.
I am equally concerned about our defensive backs, especially the safties. There were a lot of blown assignments last year.
by Jumpn_JackFlash on Aug 6, 2009 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Also, in defense of the linebackers, I think the reason they played so poorly at times was because they were playing out of position and running on fumes. You have to consider that midway through the season we did not have enough healthy DB’s to play nickel and dime packages. We also lost Blackmon for a while to injury which lead to depth issues. So linebackers ended up trying to cover slot recievers and speedy running backs, which are bad matchups for most linebackers, coupled with the fact that they played nearly the entire game because the offense went 3 and out most of the time they had the ball.
I definately think they need to improve but those factors contributed to the bad play. And if we are lucky enough to avoid some injuries, they may improve by leaps and bounds.
by Jumpn_JackFlash on Aug 6, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Especially
The part about the offense and three and outs. That defense was always exhausted, yet still performed well enough at times to keep games respectable.
If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik
Todd is right...
…..that linebacker play was better early in 2008. MSU was pretty effectively shut down. They even did a fair job against Charles Scott. Tennessee went nowhere. When it was all said and done, we did hold Vandy to 14 points, with no second half offense of our own.
…..My complaint in the early games was tight ends running around loose, and I think that was Rhoades’ schemes. When I started really homing in on linebacker play, was from the West Virginia game, on.
Charles Scotts stat line from the AU game last year
Carries: 21
Yards: 132
Ave: 6.3
Long: 31
I don’t think that is a fair job. It was raining 10yd runs in the second half…
You just made my point without knowing it.....
“It was raining 10yd runs in the second half”. There is a reason that it was in the second half…..when your offense can’t manage to keep the ball long much less score your defense wears down. By the second half in most if not all games last season the defense was gassed from being on the field too long and the LSU and WVU games were shining examples of this.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
True, but...
…..Tuberville defenses have always allowed an occasional 8-15 yard run. They attack, and sometimes miss. The goal is to set up long yardage on 2nd and 3rd down. So what, if you break a 20 yarder, on your side of the field? You’ll still end up facing 4th and 10 at midfield, most likely. Tub and Co. won a lot of games, that way.
……Facing Charles Scott last season, was scary. Ultimately, though, he wasn’t what beat us. It was Jarrett Lee firing strikes in the second half, and our complete inability to do anything about it. Checking out Scott’s 21 carries: 6, -3 (killed the drive); 9,9 (set up a FG); 4 (drive ended, too much Hatch running around); 9, 2, 14, 0 (oops, 2nd and 10, dead drive.); 0 (2nd and 10, another dead drive); 0 (a Hatch scramble helps provide another set of downs), 6 (half runs out.)
…..2nd half: 12, 1 (clutch pass to Dickson keeps the drive alive, LSU passes the entire rest of the drive for a TD); next drive, no Scott. (One negative carry by Murphy, drive fails, punt); Scott for 11 (then all passes to another LSU TD); 12, 9, 31, then 0 (drive settles for a FG); Scott for 0 (3 and out); Then the game winning drive, Scott had 1 carry for 3. (Lee hits 4 passes, the last to LaFell for the TD).
…..Basically, Scott’s running set up two field goals. You could, of course, argue that his presence altered Auburn’s defensive play enough for those passes to work. Still, if Lee doesn’t make those throws, it’s a whole different ballgame.
Acid, I’m learning a lot about the way your mind works. You must write stuff down during the game, or else find a place that has the play-by-play annotated, like in baseball. This is a very detailed approach.
I don’t analyze football that way. I take more of an overall impression from the game. How successful is the running game, passing game, our offense, their defense, etc. Only if I see patterns emerge do I begin to take names/numbers.
One of the first things I watch for is the opening drive. Does the offense get a first down, or do they go three and out. How often does this happen? Is there a pattern, or is it random. From that quick data set I begin to see strengths and weaknesses in the two teams.
By compiling Auburn’s patterns during the course of the season, I get a sense of where the team is at overall.
But you really get into the individual numbers, gains, losses, matchups, etc. So, I have found it fascinating to read your take on things.
Thanks!
…..No, I don’t write stuff down during games. Lately, I’ve been at the keyboard, live-blogging the things, if I’m not in the stadium! TV announcers will throw the stats out frequently. That said, I’ve LOVED pouring over the stat stuff in the paper the next morning, since I was a kid!
…..One of the really neato things I’ve discovered since I took this writing gig, is that just about every team I’ve covered, has the same format on their website for stats. You can basically look up a typewritten play by play for every Division I college football game, if you know how to do it. (I’ve wasted MANY a late night perusing these things…) Find the teams website, click “statistics,” and the first thing on the screen is usually game results for the previous year. Click on “box score” for a particular game, scroll to the end, and there’s the play-by-play. Some teams do it better than others. Auburn’s tend to be very detailed. Those things were amazingly helpful, when I did those “Tommy Tuberville’s Greatest Games” posts, a while back.
……The 2008 Auburn/LSU game stuff in my comment above, came from here (scroll to the end, or hit Cntrl-End):
http://auburntigers.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2008-2009/au04.html
Bookmarked. Thanks. That’s a source of information, and you know what they say about information. So I thank you for sharing.
But I would also like to say that sometimes the stats can be misleading. There are times when the team with the lower time of pssession and/or yards gained is not ahead. Just a thought.

by 















