Auburn at a Crossroads
On the eve of Gene Chizik's first game as Auburn head coach, the football program finds itself at a crossroads similar to what it faced in 1981. While the focus this weekend will be on Chizik and his revamped team, Auburn's chance of success down the road goes far beyond this coaching staff and team. There's a tidal wave of change sweeping the SEC and it promises to reshuffle the pecking order of the conference for the foreseeable future.
Phillip Marshall writes an excellent piece this week on the state of Auburn football (subscription required) at his site, Auburn Undercover. The story examines Auburn's ability to recruit, its athletic administration, fan support, facilities and money. How each of these categories are addressed in the next few years will go a long way toward cementing Auburn's future - for better or worse.
Today's SEC is vastly different from the conference we knew even five years ago. Love him or hate him, Commissioner Mike Slive has put the conference on-par with some professional leagues in this country. The recent $3 billion television contract with CBS and ESPN guarantees more exposure and competition for each league member.
Former Auburn athletic director David Housel once famously said the athletic department was in a building war with every program in the country. It's safe to say that war has expanded to marketing and exposure. Certain SEC schools, primarily the state institutions, hold a natural advantage over schools like Auburn who must work harder and spend more just to stay on par with its competitors.
It's widely accepted that Auburn, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee and LSU make up the top tier of the SEC. These six schools have traditionally won the most games, claimed the most conference and national titles and gotten the most exposure.
This was not always the case.
Ole Miss fans can attest to nothing staying the same. Once a great Southern football power, the Rebel program has remained stagnant now for more than 40 years. They enjoyed tremendous success under legendary coach Johnny Vaught, winning five SEC championships, the last coming in 1963. Georgia Tech had similar success under Bobby Dodd, winning four conference titles before leaving the SEC in 1964. They too have seen their fortunes take a nose dive over the last half century.
As hard as it is to believe today, Florida was hardly an SEC powerhouse until just prior to the turn of the century. Before winning the league title in 1991, the Gators had never claimed an SEC championship. Since then, they've gone on to win seven more conference championships and three national titles. Times do change.
Auburn came close to a fate like Ole Miss in the late 1970's. Had it not been for some forward thinking school leaders who pushed to keep Auburn relevant, the Tigers could easily be in the same boat as the Rebels today.
There were two seismic events that ushered Auburn to the head of the pack and helped ensure success for the next 30 years.
The construction of the west side upper deck at Jordan-Hare Stadium in 1980 ushered in an era of new respect for Auburn football. For the first time, the school had facilities that were on par with others around the country. It meant Auburn no longer was forced to play Tennessee and other big name opponents at Legion Field.
Alabama would follow the Volunteers in 1989, making Birmingham games a thing of the past for Auburn. As small as it seems now, this simple upgrade sent a message to the college football world that Auburn was ready to play big boy football. It later led to visits by Texas and Nebraska. Auburn was officially part of the new world order.
The hiring of Pat Dye was the final piece of the puzzle. Unless you lived through it, it's hard to describe the psyche of Auburn people following the retirement of Shug Jordan in 1975. When Jordan finally said goodbye, he was the third winningest active coach in college football. However, his final season ended in a disappointing 4-6-1 record.
From the '75 season through Doug Barfield's final year in 1980, Auburn posted a 32-32-1 record, including nine straight losses to Alabama. At the same time, Paul Bryant was hitting his stride in Tuscaloosa, claiming national titles in 1978 and 1979. To make matters worse, Auburn's other rival, Georgia, claimed a national title in 1980 behind the running of future Heisman winner Herschel Walker.
Auburn was at a crossroads. Were they going to join Ole Miss and Georgia Tech as SEC has-beens or would they - could they - step up and compete with the big boys of the conference?
We know the rest of the story.
After being rebuked by Georgia coach and Auburn alumnus Vince Dooley in 1981, Auburn turned to another UGA graduate in Dye. Within two seasons he'd beaten Alabama, forced Bryant into retirement and not only taken control of the state, but quickly grabbed dominance of the SEC and held it for most of the 1980's.
Was it luck? Good fortune? How did Auburn meet the challenge 30 seasons ago and what lessons can we take away from that time? When the Tigers kickoff tomorrow, the program will meet head-on many of the same challenges faced during Dye's early years.
Today's SEC finds its top tier teams pulling away fast from the other institutions in terms of wins, money, exposure and facilities. The recent renovations of stadiums, locker rooms and practice facilities at Alabama, LSU and Florida have put them in a different category from the rest of the SEC.
When Alabama completes its next phase of renovation, Bryant-Denny Stadium will be the fourth largest stadium in college football seating more than 101,000. This follows an upgrade a few years back making the facility one of the most beautiful in the country. Even an Auburn person has to admit it's impressive.
A lot of people questioned why Auburn didn't expand its stadium rather than spend $100 million on a new basketball arena. The truth is, why would they? While University officials often announce crowds of more than 86,000 for home games, those who attend can tell you Auburn didn't have a hard sellout all last season.
And yes, there are still plenty of good seats available for Saturday's opener with Louisiana Tech. It's hard to disagree with Marshall, who writes, "There's no way to put a positive spin on that (not selling out) for a program that had one bad season after averaging 10 wins a year for the previous five."
While it would be great to expand Jordan-Hare, the simple truth is, there's not a demand. At least not today.
Athletic Director Jay Jacobs has been a lightening rod of controversy and one of the most unpopular figures in school history. But when it comes to managing the budget, you have to give him props. He's managed a budget of more than $80 million annually and has maximized every penny the school brings in.
But it still may not be enough.
As good as Jacobs is at keeping a budget, his mere presence may be part of Auburn's bigger problem. School officials will point to a sagging economy as a primary reason for the decline in ticket sales. But Alabama, LSU, Georgia and Tennessee are dealing with the same recession and they don't seem to have a problem filling its seats.
Auburn's lack of ticket sales runs deeper than the recession or a poor performance last year. Since the 2003 Jet Gate debacle where Auburn officials tried to hire Bobby Petrino away from Louisville, the Auburn family has been divided.
One faction sits with board of trustee member Bobby Lowder and is widely thought to include Jacobs and Dye among its ranks. While believed to be small in size, until recently its influence and money gave the group unrivaled power in athletic department affairs. Lowder's recent fall from grace after the collapse of Colonial Bank gives fans hope that the end is near. His term on the board of trustees is set expire in 2011.
On the other side sits most mainstream Auburn fans and is assumed to include the vast majority of school graduates. While there's no shortage of money or manpower, until now there's been a lack of political clout needed to move Lowder and Jacobs out. There have been several organizations formed in recent years with the sole intent of retaking the University. So far, these efforts have seen minimal results.
Many believe the perceived lack of support by way of donations and ticket sales is a direct result of alumni finally drawing the line and withdrawing its support of the program - call it tough love. Most fans seem to have reluctantly rallied around Chizik and wish him the best, but he's still perceived to be in Lowder's camp - which for fans is the wrong side of the fence.
Privately some alumni acknowledge that failure by Chizik coupled with Lowder's financial problems may finally free the University of this 30 year stranglehold. It's also widely held that failure on Chizik's part will spell the end of Jacobs' tenure.
Unfortunately this theory, true or not, could spell big trouble for the football program. Things such as recruiting, facilities improvements and marketing are moving at such a fast clip among conference schools that an Auburn divided runs the risk of seeing the football program fall behind other member institutions. While a Chizik failure may result in the Lowder/Jacobs regime coming to a close, it could also mean that Auburn loses its status among the elite in the SEC.
"For most of the past decade, Auburn has been able to look the best in the SEC and the nation in the eye," Marshall writes. "But Florida, Georgia, Alabama and LSU have flung down the gauntlet. Can everything it takes for Auburn to keep up come together?"
That's the most important question facing Auburn Nation as it prepares to kickoff the 2009 season. Auburn drastically needs a coach that not only wins on the field, but who can bring Auburn people together. Dye was never the most endearing coach to fans, but his actions on the field far out shadowed any hang-ups fans may have had about him. The secret to his success off the field was his ability to keep everyone on the same page - something that hasn't been achieved since his departure in 1992.
Can Chizik achieve success on the field and perhaps just as importantly off it? It won't be easy. Winning soothes the soul. It makes problems appear smaller. Tommy Tuberville was able to mask many issues simply because he won. When things went south, the problems became bigger. Realistically it should be a while before Chizik competes with the likes of Florida, LSU and Alabama. Can he hold it together that long?
The bigger question is whether Jacobs can ever repair his image with Auburn people. Will they ever trust him? Right now, it seems unlikely. His biggest sin seems to be guilt by association. Whether or not he and Lowder have a relationship is anyone's guess, but perception is reality. Many believe peace will not come to Auburn until both are out of the picture.
With this as a backdrop, Auburn starts a new era Saturday night.
Good luck Coach Chizik. We're pulling for you.
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
A lot of the problem with ticket sales currently...
are the fact that a lot of Auburn fans are still bitter about Tuberville’s departure and they won’t buy tickets until they see positive results on the field. You talk to a lot of em today and they’ll tell you that. Fair weather fans are common in all teams and sports. How many bammers did you see flying their flags and sporting crimson at the local walmart on saturdays during the Shula era? Hardly any. That’s what were going through right now.
Give Coach Chizik time to win and everything will be back to normal. Quite frankly, if you don’t support Auburn now then we don’t need or want ya!
Good luck Coach Chizik! Go out there and prove these naysayers otherwise! WAR DAMN EAGLE!!!
by AUrebel82 on Sep 4, 2009 2:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Very well said
and very true. If you’re not for us, you’re against us. I’m for AU and Coach Chizik. Here’s to a good 2009… WAR EAGLE!!!
"We're at AUBURN. I think that says it all. We're going after the best in the country -- no matter when, what, where, how. That's how we're going to do it. We're going to work really hard to try to get that done every year -- including this one." -- Auburn University Head Football Coach Gene Chizik
by AUshorecm on Sep 5, 2009 2:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the reality of our situation really sank in...
…..till this week, for me. I opened my newspaper this morning, and there it was in black and white: The Birmingham News doesn’t even think Auburn can beat Louisiana Tech!
http://blog.al.com/birmingham-news-sports/2009/09/charles_hollis_picks_alabama_s.html
……I want to see some offense, Saturday night! After watching a game and a half of club fights last night, I’m hoping Auburn can be a school that moves the ball. I’m not looking forward to a season of 7-3 clunkers…
by Acid Reign on Sep 4, 2009 8:12 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn
If I wasn’t worried about Auburn’s situation before this article, I certainly am now. I know folks pound on me for my obsessive pessimism, but after reading this my fears only seem justified. Now, I’m by no means a fair-weather fan and as I said, I’ll be there Saturday regardless. The thing that does at least give me hope, Chizik has this program headed in the right program it seems. I wouldn’t mind seeing some more building on Jordan-Hare and some new state of the art facilities. Whether you agree with it or not, the new basketball gym does seem to propose the idea that Auburn is in fact going to compete in this era.
Still, the Lowder and Jacobs situation worries me. Nobody likes Jacobs and I can’t understand why anybody would. I can understand someone’s bitterness about the whole thing. I think that speaking out against something that’s clearly wrong will help the program more in the long run. In the short term, this stuff is going to hurt us, but if we can get somebody like Jacobs out, it will be beneficial in the end I believe.
by Sparkey on Sep 4, 2009 8:19 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Auburn blood...........
that’s what runs through my veins. I can’t even contemplate not buying my season tickets in an effort to show my distaste and discomfort with any Auburn official. Some of these “fans” claim to be from the “old school” and say that “you don’t understand how it was when I was there…..blah blah blah…….we went through alot…….blah blah blah……”, as if that gives them the right to carry themselves in a holier than thou attitude, like their support of this University is any greater than mine. Now, in this time, when Auburn needs its FAMILY to be there to support it, to help pick it up after the claws of defeat shredded its moral and tossed to the roadside, left to die a lonesome and agonizing death, these “fans” are simply driving by, unwilling to lend a helping hand. Instead, these “fans” who claim to be acting in the best interest of the University are doing the exact opposite, they are killing it and they are ripping the family apart. What makes this University so great is that the rest of the country DOESN’T understand what makes it so great. We are the fans that line the streets by the THOUSANDS to cheer on our team as they make that imfamous walk to Jordan-Hare, even in the face of a losing season. Why? Because what makes Auburn special is that it’s not JUST about the football team and its record, its about AUBURN. After a stinging defeat, we wake up the next morning and push on with the same intensity and passion as we did just hours before the game. Auburn is in our hearts. It’s in our blood and no 5-7 season, departures of a coaching staff, or the stranglehold of an elitist board of trustees can take that from us….unless it was never there in the first place. So I say to these “fans” who in protest are abandoning their sons and felllow brothers, remember the creed you once spoke “…I believe in the human touch, which cultivates sympathy with my fellow men and mutual helpfulness and brings happiness for all……..And because Auburn men and women believe in these things, I believe in Auburn and love it.”
by TampaTiger09 on Sep 4, 2009 8:34 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
But, I do think that people should speak out against things that are wrong. I also say that we should keep our support up for Auburn, because that is in fact as you said what separates us from everyone else. I just don’t think we have to blindly be loyal to some people that are almost corrupt. I mean, I love the U.S. and support the troops, but that doesn’t mean I have to believe mightily in everything the government does. In a similar situation, I think the people should support Auburn, but we should also speak out when we know things are happening that are wrong. Period.
by Sparkey on Sep 4, 2009 8:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I hear what you're saying.....
but I don’t think 90% of Auburn fans who claim to “hate” Jacobs, for example, even know what they hate. All I ever hear is, “he made a bad hire”, “he’s running the program into the ground”, “he’s in bed with Lowder”. What spefically is it? I’ve had the pleasure of meeting and speaking with Jay many many times, I’ve met his family, including his parents. His mother and father live in the Tampa area and are members of my Auburn Alumni club. I understand that that doesn’t mean he is incapable of making bad decisions, but so many people speak of a hatrad of this man and they don’t even know him, nor do they really know who he is. Everyone here has known someone in their lifetime who just didn’t do a good job, whether it be at work or someone you hired to do a job for you…..but you didn’t hate them, you didn’t ridicule them. So many Auburn fans these days feel that their passion for Auburn is an excuse and a license to speak hatred about people and to basically ignore the things that we as Auburn people are suppose to stand for. It just pains me to think of the pressure these young kids on our football team must feel to succeed, for themselves, for their University, for their coach. Now you have them hearing things like the “success of Auburn’s future lies in the hands of this season and whether or not Chizik is a Jacobs’ success or failure.” Now I am in no way saying that Auburn fans should blindly by loyal, but at least understand what the issues are, who should address them and in a civil and humain way, go about taking measures to have your voice heard. But DO NOT abandon your team, your family, to make a point. And by people saying they are waiting for success on the field, or for the administration to fire Jacobs before they’ll repurchase their season tickets, they are doing just that, abandoning their family. I understand they have the right, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do.
by TampaTiger09 on Sep 4, 2009 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice post
Unfortunately in the blogosphere, dissatisfaction with someone conveniently gets boiled down to ‘hate’ a lot of times. It’s an unfortunate by-product of this easy-to-digest medium. Your average Jacobs naysayer, when pressed, will probably admit that they just don’t think he’s qualified to be in that position. Few actually would believe that he doesn’t have the best of intentions for Auburn, but we just disagree with the method of acheiving those goals.
by War Eagle Atlanta on Sep 5, 2009 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dye wasn't endearing to fans??
While overall this is a good article, I think way too much is given to the whole “Lowder factor” at Auburn. Many times Auburn fans seem like conspiracy theorists, finding a way to link everything bad at Auburn back to Bobby Lowder. Me thinks he gets way too much credit in this department.
I would definitely disagree with the statement about Coach Dye not being “endearing to fans”. That’s not the consensus of fans I know now or during his 12 years on the plains. I think most fans were excited to see him back in the athletic department after Tuberville shunned him for years. I also think fans never embraced Coach Tubs they were they did coach Dye. Most recognize that he (Dye) is responsible for Auburn being the great program that it has been since 1981.
And I think 99% of fans have come around to being cautiously optimistic about Chizik and are behind him. I think we will surprise the college football world this year and all will be well on the plains! WDE!
by atltiger38 on Sep 4, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't Agree More
I was too young to appreciate Shug Jordan and too worried about stupid stuff to hate Barfield, but I came into loving Auburn football with Coach Dye. I don’t know if he was “endearing” to me, but I thought he was a great coach and did wonderful things for Auburn.
It’s kind of like politics; I’m a registered Republican, but I ought to be an Independent. I tend to stay away from the extremes. I think Lowder has not been good for Auburn, overall, but he is has not been Satan either and has done good as well – I would probably say the same for Jacobs. Or, on the other hand, like Mr. Miaggi says, stand in the center, get squished like grape.
Who really gives a crap anyway; let’s play football. WDE
by UglyJoe on Sep 4, 2009 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Endearing was probably not the best choice...
of words. Dye was endearing in his own way. I guess what I was trying to say was that he wasn’t as fan friendly as Tuberville. Now that doesn’t mean he wasn’t good to fans, but Tuberville just had a way of connecting.
Track'em Tigers.com
by Jay Coulter on Sep 4, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Old School Coach
New school coach. That’s all it was…
by War Eagle Atlanta on Sep 5, 2009 1:10 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jay
You said:
While University officials often announce crowds of more than 86,000 for home games, those who attend can tell you Auburn didn’t have a hard sellout all last season.
If that LSU game wasn’t a sellout las year, I’d be surprised. It was loud as crap in there! LSU doesn’t sell out all of its rent-a-win games either which is why the university is putting more emphasis in upgrading the existing structures instead of expansion. It will likely be 20 years or so before they expand Death Valley.
by LSU Jonno on Sep 4, 2009 9:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd have to agree.
…..Southern Miss was packed last year, at least till the rains came. There were a lot of empty seats at Arkansas, but the bottom had fallen out on the season that week. The Franklin firing happened, and we were coming off a loss to Vanderbilt. “Coming off a loss to Vanderbilt.” That phrase is JUST WRONG! It’s like saying 1+1 = 500. That can’t really have happened, can it?
……One thing about Auburn folks is that they generally will speak their mind. Might not be pretty, but you can find out where they stand. We’ve had public embarrassment over this sort of thing many times, but on the other hand, leaders are held accountable.
……I don’t know Jay Jacobs, but I do know how he handled the publicity on the Will Muschamp debacle, and how the Tuberville contract negotiations went last fall. I don’t know what went on behind closed doors, but Jacobs was unable or unwilling to reassure the Auburn nation, and what he did say was insulting to the coaches involved. Diplomatic? Absolutely not.
……Administrators have to make tough, unpopular decisions, sometimes. If Jacobs can keep us in the black, keep the donations rolling in, and not keep alienating folks, we should support him. The Chizik situation will sort itself out on the field in a few years. It’s a water-under-the-bridge/sunk-cost/done-deal. War Eagle, Jay and Gene, and best of luck. You’ll need it!
…..I live through the endless 7 year NCAA probation as a kid, and the disintegration of Shug’s administration and the un-supported Barfield years. Our current troubles are nothing, compared to those years. I stuck with the team then, and I’m sticking now. Could be worse. I’m sure glad I’m not an Oregon alum, right now!
by Acid Reign on Sep 4, 2009 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jonno...
Good point. LSU was perhaps the exception, although there were a few empties in the corners.
Track'em Tigers.com
by Jay Coulter on Sep 4, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to wonder if the attendance
is a result of location and the degrees that are the most popular at AU. Bama is a stone’s throw from Birmingham which is the largest population center in the state. I think that brings in lots of casual fans. I grew up in B,ham and my whole family are Bama fans, though they couldn’t tell you the starting QB’s name because they aren’t actual fans. Yet, we’d go to games all the time at Legion Field growing up, because it was something to do. I imagine that kind of things still goes on now even after the games have moved a few miles to the west. AU doesn’t have the luxury of luring casual fans to the games from a large population center. So AU has to rely on it’s alumni to attend games. However, AU kicks out mostly Business and Engineering grads. Not a lot of employment opportunity nearby, especially for engineers, so alum are more spread out. I myself am in Dallas which is a great location for engineers, but not so great for making it to the games on Saturday :( Just my $0.02
by TexasAUtiger on Sep 4, 2009 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's a great point...
You are right… I don’t imagine Auburn pulls many “drop in visits” like they perhaps do in Tuscaloosa. Never thought of that point.
Track'em Tigers.com
by Jay Coulter on Sep 4, 2009 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't you worry...
I-85 south from Atlanta is pretty heavily trafficked on gameday, and north in the evenings is like a bullet train.
I wonder when Atlanta metro will supplant Bamaham as the largest concentration of Auburn alumni. Anyone?
by War Eagle Atlanta on Sep 5, 2009 1:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jay Jacobs
I have met and listen to Jay Jacob’s plans for Auburn University, and I believe him to be on the right track. I fully support him in his athletic plans for Auburn University. I was as upset as anyone when he hired Coach Chizik but I have listened to him discuss the reasons behind the hiring, and I fully believe time will prove Jay Jacobs made the correct decision. As athletic director he has to make some really tough decisions and I don’t believe he works for anyone but the Auburn University president. I belive the accusations of collusion with the some individual members of the BOT is inuendo and are unfounded. I believe it is time to move on from the Coach Tubberville era and move on to the future of Auburn University and its football program, the athletic programs, as well as the academic programs.
It would behoove all of Auburn supporters to increase the intensity of their support for our beloved Auburn University. Thanks.
by WEAUB on Sep 4, 2009 12:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Um...
I have met and listen to Jay Jacob’s plans for Auburn University
Care to explain any of that?
I have listened to him discuss the reasons behind the hiring,
Oh yeah, and what were they?
I believe it is time to move on from the Coach Tubberville
One “b”.
You are either:
A) Jay Jacobs
B) A Troll
C) Very uninformed pretending to be very informed
"Jay Jacobs can't go to the bathroom without Bobby Lowder's permission" - Paul Finebaum
by GumptownTiger on Sep 4, 2009 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What we have here is a failure to communicate.
Why do we seem to be having problems understanding that we’re not necessarily disagreeing with each other. If we are really at a crossroads, then how did we get there? What were the deciding factors causing us to be at such a point? Is it not a fair opinion that the athletic director might have not put the program on the right path as of late?
First of all, let me state that I don’t think anybody on here is screaming to have the Tubberville era back. I think people are having an issue with the way the program is in such a state of flux. I don’t understand why some seem to think that if you say Jacobs isn’t doing a good job, you aren’t supportive of Auburn University. I disagree that he has Auburn on the right track. I’m sorry, things just do not appear that way to me. Plus, saying you gave someone $5 million when they quit because “It was the right thing to do.” makes it hard to believe you in the future. I do not support Jay Jacobs as an athletic director. He may be a fine man personally, I have no reason to think otherwise. Having said that, I am not happy with the stream of questions Auburn athletics seem to be having to answer currently. I do not understand why people who like him are saying that means you don’t support Auburn or that you’re stuck in the Tubberville era.
I was one of the first people who started to say that recruiting was not going well for the Tigers. Tubberville had lost his fire. Look, that whole story is gone and done. That does not mean that we all have to love Jay Jacobs. I realize that hating someone for such a thing is just flat out wrong. I might’ve said something like that myself earlier, but I think it’s wrong to hate someone in general. As was everyone else, I was letting my emotions get the best of me. Now, looking at things logically, I am still not fond of the job he is doing. He may actually be trying his best to really help Auburn University. Unfortunately, so far the results don’t seem to be showing themselves in a real positive way.
Again, I along with anyone else that possesses the ability of logical reason think you’ve got to give Chizik time. I think he’s gathered a great, not good set of assistants under him. Plus, the gym being built seems to mean that Auburn is serious about competing in basketball. With that said, it remains to be seen if Lebo can get Auburn over the hump and into the NCAA tournament. I’m afraid of Lebo being fired after a poor season that seems all to possible this year because of so many of them being seniors and now it’s a bunch of new faces. Yes, I screamed for him to go, but once the decision was made that he stay on board I think it wrong to let him go after this year. It’s a down year and he should not be judged poorly from it. Jacobs seems like the type to fire him if that is the case though-we’ll see on that. I do hope I’m wrong about him as an A.D. and that Auburn does great. Having said that, just because I don’t like the job he’s done it does not mean I do not support the team. That’s just ridiculous.
by Sparkey on Sep 4, 2009 2:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow, excellent analysis
I had never thought of some of these points. A little troubling.
The article doesn’t address the impact of Lowder’s demise at Colonial. How will his diminished influence on the board (if it is in fact diminished) affect this ‘divide’ among the program’s supporters?
by atlWDE on Sep 4, 2009 5:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks atlWDE...
Lowder’s “new position” should be interesting to watch in the coming months.
Track'em Tigers.com
by Jay Coulter on Sep 4, 2009 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















