Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Pick a Card, any Card!

     War Eagle, everybody. WOW, was there ever a better obfuscation of a team's abilities on national TV EVER? Auburn's A-Day has come and gone with few observers drawing any meaningful conclusions on what is to transpire this fall with this team! The defense was severely handicapped, in that they could not use all-out blitzes. However, they could SHOW blitz, as long as they sent only 4 guys on the rush. Sadly, this did pretty much destroy the running game, even so. Appearances by the first team secondary were scarce. We saw little of McNeil, Savage, Thorpe or Washington. Instead, we saw a VERY deep receiving corps work against the likes of Ikeem Means, Drew Cole, Blake Poole, Dorian Rhodes, Tyler Mickens, Rodney Cofield, and Woody Paramore. As a result, we saw no interceptions, few defended passes, and a whopping 488 passing yards in a very short scrimmage. The various Auburn offenses managed a ridiculous 74 percent completion percentage, for 9.7 yards per pass, with no interceptions and a pair of touchdowns. Missed tackles were a HUGE problem. Lest anyone get excited, the offense also managed only 50 yards rushing, on 37 attempts, for a sorry 1.35 yards per rush. Much like last season, special teams were again a mixed bag. Wes Byrum hit every point-kick he attempted, but we still can't make the end zone on kickoffs, and punting was atrocious. Every kick return looked on the verge of breaking it. If there's a silver lining on special teams, it was that no kicks were dropped. Wow, we need that to continue!

 

     It seems that a deliberate attempt to keep probable quarterback starter Cameron Newton under wraps was on. Newton played a few series in the first half, but these drives were ALWAYS started with a handoff on first down, and followed by deep throws against the first team defense. Newton wound up with only 3 completions in 8 attempts, with at least one throw off the back foot out of bounds toward a triple-covered receiver. Ugh. Caudle, Trotter, and Mosely were given numerous screen and quick-hitter opportunities. Newton ALWAYS seemed to be looking deep. Was that by design? Or is Newton the sort of QB that will ignore the easy screens, and always try to force the deep pass? In Newton's defense, we got a good look at Coordinator Gus Malzhan giving Neil Caudle HELL about checking down to a successful draw play. Newton may be only guilty of not deviating from the script. Coaches gave Newton exactly one zone-read opportunity, and Newton kept. With Mario Fannin headed towards a blown open side of the D, Newton instead kept, and headed right towards an unblocked Michael Goggins, who did an admirable job of breaking down. Ooops. Sack for Goggins. Maybe in a live QB game, Newton shakes him off. Maybe. Goggins had perfect position. Wrong read, any way you slice it. Not that other quarterbacks distinguished themselves on the zone-read, either. Caudle was one of two on the option read. The other two didn't really have the opportunity.

 

     Receivers took a step backward in this game. We saw a number of drops. Tight end/H-back Jay Wisner had several go through his hands. The normally sure-handed Eric Smith had an ugly drop, although his blocking play was near-flawless. Phillip Lutzencirchen, the heir apparent at the "3" spot, appeared a bit bigger, and pretty awkward and slow receiving. He wouldn't be the first athlete that the Auburn staff bulked up into receiver incapability. Onterio McCalebb got numerous looks at inside running. He was bigger looking, but still incapable of moving the pile. Heavier and a step slower, McCalebb is in danger of being sidelined.

 

     Taking advantage of an unbalanced offensive line, defensive coordinator Ted Roof abused the right side of the Auburn offensive line. With JUCO tackle signee Roszell Gayden sidelined with an injury, as well as guards Mike Berry and Bart Eddins, Roof set Antoine Carter (defensive MVP) up frequently to wreak havoc on the right side. Backups John Sullen and Brandon Moseley didn't play, either. The right side of the O-line was a mess. Pressure came early and often on all quarterbacks, from the right side. Kudos to all four Qbs, for minimizing the situation. The D STILL managed only nine sacks total in the game, with the touch rule on Qbs. Linebacker stalwarts Josh Bynes, and Craig Stevens had solid games. Jonathan Evans also contributed 5 tackles. We had hoped Eltoro Freeman would have an improved spring. Freeman was frequently around the ball, but made only one tackle on the day, much like last spring.

 

Position by Position Breakdowns, after the jump!



 

Star-divide

Defensive Line: The only A-list tackle that played was Nick Fairley, and he was a FORCE. Fairley only recorded one tackle, but the middle was CLOSED for runners. We didn't see Mike Blanc, Zach Clayton, or even Derrick Lykes. But the middle was still clogged. That's a huge kudos to coach Tracy Rocker. Well done!

 

Linebackers: Wow, is Craig Stevens EVER more well-suited to the weak side! He was much more effective in space. Jonathan Evans on the strong side did well, too. The run was shut down. Josh Bynes led all tacklers. We'll be ok in 2010 against the run. How to cover the Jock Sanders' of the CFB world, well... it's still a work in progress. As is depth behind Stevens, Sanders, and Evans. Eltoro Freeman was essentially MIA.

 

Secondary: It was a repeat of a year ago. No one expected to contribute played any significant downs. The walk-on group was a step slow, and missed plenty of tackles.

 

Punting: Senior Ryan Shoemaker was the man, and he hit one monster 53 yard howitzer. The other two kicks were a short shank, and a 20 yard pop fly. More consistency is needed.

 

Punt returns weren't live, but Quindarious Carr caught and secured everything he attempted. That's a HUGE improvement from last season! Carr also fielded one at the four yard line. Ooops. I wonder if he was instructed to field it no matter what? He smartly let a similar kick bound out of the end zone for a touchback, earlier. I'm still really nervous about this aspect of the team.

 

Kick Returns: We used a variety of folks back on kicks, and all were fielded cleanly. If there's any significant A-Day improvement to point to from a year ago, it's the fielding of kicks. Nothing was dropped. The big worry was that all of the return men appeared to have BIG lanes, if it had have been live. We're still not covering well, I'm afraid!

 

Kickoffs: I had hoped that we might manage more touchback-endzone kickoffs this fall, but this A-Day didn't offer that hope. Senior Wes Byrum handled all kickoffs, and we averaged only the 6 yard line. On the positive side, they were all high, and there was nothing outside the 15. That alone is an improvement. Still worried about coverage, though.

 

Placekicking: Wes Byrum is still gold, hitting all of his kicks. Back up walkon Chandler Brooks missed a 22 yard chip shot.

 

Offensive Line: Lee Ziemba, Byron Issom and Ryan Pugh were DOMINANT. Other players in the game decidedly WEREN'T! We had soft coverage universally on the defense, so there were outlets for the Qbs. Short yardage running was miserable. That's no different from the past two years.

 

Inside Receivers: This was pretty much a fail grade. We caught ok, with Jay Wisner leading with 5 catches. None of the the slot/fullback guys blocked well. We need DRAMATIC improvement here, or a LOT more of Eric Smith. He had limited snaps, but did well while he was in, aside from one dropped pass.

 

Outside Receivers: We saw a clean-cut example of child abuse on Saturday. We lined up the deepest position on the team against walk-on cover guys, and managed a ridiculous 9.76 yards per pass. It's meaningless. We had few contested catches, and those that were tended to be dropped. Play the starters next spring at corner, please, Gene Chizik?

 

Lead Blockers: If Eric Smith was in there, guys were stood up, and things happened on the line in the running game. If Smith was out, we had nobody. This is definitely an area to be looked at in fall camp, when the new guys come in. We won't be able to run 2 rushes to one pass successfully in the SEC, without better blocking this year.

 

Running Backs: I was really happy for Mario Fannin. We know that over the past 3 years, he's been our most dangerous offensive player. He's also been one of the ones most likely to turn the ball over. This A-Day, we saw none of the turnovers, and lots of well-played downs on Mario's part. I feel a LOT more comfortable at RB, after watching Mario play. A LOT of the ridiculous QB numbers are due to Mario's pass blocking in this game. On the other hand, in Onterrio McCalebb, I see the next Markieth Cooper/Rusty Williams. He's bulked up, and has become an average-speed, undersized SEC back. We've made another mistake in the weight room. Dontae Aycock has good balance. Here's hoping he can and WILL adapt to the H-back role.

 

Quarterbacks: I was PROUFOUNDLY depressed about this slot after last year's A-Day. Not so, this year. Neil Caudle STILL locks in on one receiver with his eyes, but the guy knows where to go with the ball. If he runs, he's good! Barrett Trotter has a Dan-Marino-like release. He can get the ball out accurately, too. We'd do well, even if Moseley was the starter. You've got mobility and football smarts, any way we go at QB this year. Cam Newton was supposed to be all-World coming in, but I "hope" (HOPE!) they hamstrung him in this scrimmage! Newton was the only QB in the game not to get a first down passing attempt. All of Newton's throws were deep. He never really threw one up for grabs, but the high miss on a wide open TD to Wisner in the end zone worries me. There was another "sling it off the back foot" out of bounds third and long deal later on. More to the point, I don't really know how Gus Malzhan's check-down system works. What options did Newton have? We don't need a QB that will ignore the 10 yard swing pass in lieu of the 40-yard dangerous throw downfield, like Ryan Mallett did last year for Arkansas. I can't predict how the Auburn QB race will really turn out, but I feel confident that we won't see another stretch like 2009, where we couldn't do anything past 5 yard downfield, like the last season Arky/UK/LSU stretch. We're in a WHOLE lot better place, at QB!

 

     On Defense, despite giving up 36 of 50 completions in the spring game, I'm cautiously optimistic about the defense. I think we held back most of our secondary starters, and we stopped the run well.

 

     On special teams, I think the kicking race is sewed up. Wes Byrum is THE MAN, on scoring. If one of the newcomers can kick to the end zone, Byrum might lose the kickoff duties. Punting seems to be wide open. Shoemaker has potential, but he's been plagued by inconsistency, and was again on A-Day. I think we'll be fine on kick returns, and I think a special effort has been made on punt returns. All's not well, though, when the return man fields one on the four yard line on A-Day. Not fine, at all! Kick coverage still looks EXTREMELY worrisome!

 

     On the O-line, depth has pretty much been the issue for several years. 2010 is no exception. Neither JUCO transfer replacement at right tackle, Roszell Gayden or Brandon Moseley made it through spring unscathed. Reserves on the O-line have been scarce as well. All hopes for a dominant Auburn offense in 2010 rely on this unit getting well!

 

     It's a change from most years in the past decade, but I think Auburn has little problem at the skill positions going into 2010. Where the Tigers have issues are on the lines. How well the freshmen can contribute will hold the key, I suspect! All in all, I approve of how things were handled this spring. We've got a unique staff in place at Auburn, and we should celebrate while we can! War Eagle, and have a great Monday!

--

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good Read Acid.

I hope you are wrong about McCalebb. He may have seemed a little slow Saturday, but its not like any of the running backs set the world on fire running the ball.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 4:57 AM CDT reply actions  

Agree

aubtigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT

by aubtigerman on Apr 19, 2010 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nice read

I think the offense was toned down for Cam. I think with his howitzer of an arm, the passing game will be more styled for the deep ball. With Caudle I think the offense will be more pass heavy, but focused on quick hitting passes over the middle. All in all I still have Cam as my preferred starter right now, but like you said, we could do well with Mosely in there. They all really impressed me with their performances.

Jay Wisner needs to get on the JUGs machine if he wants to see the field next year. Newton may have sailed one on him, but the other was in his hands.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Apr 19, 2010 6:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Right now it looks like Trotter and Newton to me.

Both of them have the advantage of youth on their side. Caudle hasn’t progressed enough in my opinion to warrant starting him over the other guys. I’m pretty sure his TD pass at A-day was his first of the spring. Newton has yet to throw a pick and Trotter has been efficient as has Mosely (sp). Caudle is just too high of a risk when you have two younger guys who will probably do just as well and will be coming back to benefit from the experience of 2010.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 7:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

Trotter looked very good, but Newton is the man. I don’t it see any other way. With the QB in no contact, we could not see his skill set. Newton has a cannon for an arm, lets just hope that he can hit the back out in the flat or the slot receiver in the slant route.

As mentioned Caudle tends to lock in on his primary WR. He does know where everyone is on the field and that is very impressive. I was also a bit surprised at his speed, when he kept it on the zone read.

McCalleb is a question mark. He did not look as fast as last season. Was the the added weight or the fact that it is April? On the other hand Fannin looked really quick to me. Now he needs to protect the ball better. He kept it in his right arm the whole game.

If you are a War Damn Eagle, you can War Damn anything.

by WarDamnZach on Apr 19, 2010 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ultimately I think McCalebb will be strong for us.

No pun intended. Curtis Luper knows what is doing with our backs. Nobody’s speed just dazzled me Saturday. Fannin didn’t carry tremendously, but it was mostly how the scrimmage was set up. The RB’s didn’t really have a chance to shine.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 9:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

I think Newton has the job. How do you not start someone as accurate, powerful, and fast as him? Like you said, he is even more effective when allowed to run.

If hip hop is dead, then it happened the day that Dilla died.
-Akrobatik

by Bestjagfan on Apr 19, 2010 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Enjoyed your read and ...

… I appreciate the work you put into getting this together Acid. I actually feel a little better after reading your post.
My biggest concerns are the health & production of both lines as well as the consistency of special teams.

I like all our Qb’s but I’m holding my breath on Newton. I know he is a hoss but I didn’t like his mechanics. Of course we didn’t get to see that much of him. I can’t wait till Sept.4th. War Eagle !

aubtigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT

by aubtigerman on Apr 19, 2010 8:18 AM CDT reply actions  

And on Sept. 4th, we'll see the vanilla extracted Tigers.

aubtigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT

by aubtigerman on Apr 19, 2010 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

This offense is going to be much better in 2010.

Our competition will still be stiff, but this team is much improved from a year and is good for 1-3 more regular season wins from a conservative stand point.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree. When the vanilla of Sat.'s performance is extracted come Sept. 4th, we'll see a stronger team than 2009.

aubtigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT

by aubtigerman on Apr 19, 2010 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Umm...a TERRIBLE read but that's my opinion which doesn't matter...

First of all, could you please not have an all caps word every other sentence? I mean, if you keep yelling at someone, it will lose its potency really quickly. Sorry, but that sort of thing is not something I expect from you man. Personally, I think you’re a great writer but that gimmick was just that-a gimmick.

Now, moving on to your assessment. Unfortunately, I think you’re right about McCaleb. However, if that’s the case, we can get him lighter again and use that speed once again. You never know for sure, though. There is always the possibility he isn’t used to running with that new found weight. Furthermore, other than a couple of runs for Fannin, it didn’t seem like Auburn ran much to the outside at all. The offense was so damned vanilla Saturday I needed some water to get that vanilla taste out of my mouth.

Cam Newton didn’t seem to have his head in the game Saturday. Then again, it wasn’t really even a good scrimmage so he might be a whole lot better than what was shown. I think he’s going to be good. Yes, he did miss the guy wide open, however the receivers didn’t exactly help him out much either. There were a number of passes in which they got their hands on the ball, they just didn’t make the catch. The folks I watched the game with said that Caudle was obviously the starter with Trotter second. They weren’t impressed with Newton at all and there were fans all around me saying he was terrible. I don’t think that’s the case, and you’re right about going deep every single time. For me, this was just like a fun day for Newton in that he couldn’t be sacked and apparently he was told to throw the long ball every time. I really don’t think you can take much away about Newton from this pathetic excuse for a game. Cam wasn’t allowed to get within five yards of any defender without it being blown dead it seemed like. Considering the fact he’s a mobile qb, that was not conducive for his style of play.

You know, I say that the spring game is like the preseason in the NFL. You can’t really deduce how a team will be during a competitive season with only games that don’t matter. You’re right on about Malzhan keeping everything close to his shirt sleeve. I too noticed him angry about the successful check down. The only thing I think could have made him that mad was the possibility that the qb’s were given a strict script to follow.

I must completely disagree about the defense. If Saturday’s game is meaningful in any way, the 2010 Tigers will set a new record for most points ever allowed by an Auburn defense. As you said though, it was a whole bunch of backups. By the way, I thought you did Jessel Curry an injustice in not mentioning him. I thought he was good Saturday and he seemed to be one of few guys that knows how to wrap up. Did they ever actually bring Terrell Zachary down? Damn, how many guys missed a tackle on him? I think TZ will have a break out season in 2010 but I’m not sure he is that good, I just think the guys going after him were that bad.

Lastly, I thought Auburn should have been ashamed for charging even five dollars for this, ugh, whatever you want to call it. I mean in the fourth quarter the clock never stopped even after an incomplete pass or hell even during a penalty for that matter. In fact, they only ran the clock for 9:51 in the fourth quarter. I couldn’t believe how bs this game was and how excited I was to see it. I will damn sure not go to next year’s A-Day game. I think the game, if you want to use that term ever so loosely, was pathetic. We know NOTHING about the team at all. I understand why you do that. On the other hand, if you’re going to do that, then don’t hype it up and make it seem like it’s going to be a great day. It wasn’t or anywhere close to the sort. Personally, I do believe you’re one of the best college writers I’ve ever read. Consequently, I expect better from you than this but everybody else seems to like it so that’s just me.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 9:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Sparkey

Did we wake up on the wrong side of the futon this morning?

Anyone know where I can catch the rebroadcast of the game? Comcast was running 1:38 late last night and Ionly saw the first 22 minutes.

Never before in the field of CFB recruiting, has much much been accomplished by so few, in the face of so many...

by War Eagle Atlanta on Apr 19, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think that when ESPNU picked up this game.

The coaches all decided to go even more vanilla than the usual. And for probably good reason. They weren’t running the offense at half the speed they will be in a game. And I do believe Trotter and Caudle were competing for the backup job. Newton is the man to run this offense.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree..

it was terrible; I want my money back. Oh, wait, I don’t pay for this. We’ll, at least Acid shouldn’t get paid for it….oh, wait, he doesn’t get paid. -—— Man, can’t you just say “I disagree” and be done with it?"

I appreciate every bit of information and analysis I get off this site, and for what it’s worth, I thought it was a good write-up. THANKS for doing what you do!

by UglyJoe on Apr 19, 2010 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Never said he got paid sir...

I said I think he’s great and does better than this usually.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well Sparkey...

you’ve obviously never been to an A-day game before, they are like this every year. Everybody is getting their panties in a wad over just one scrimmage. Yea, it is the biggest scrimmage of the spring, but we can’t be drawing conclusions based solely on this. If you really want to know how each of these players are doing, go to every practice, and then you can judge their performance.
But when Newton is running with the second team offense and Trotter against the 3rd or 4th team defense, I don’t really expect to find anything out.

And one more thing, everyone needs to quit worrying about McCalebb. The dude is up to a measly 175ish and you guys act like he is overweight. What other choice did we have, last year he was a track star in pads and only lasted 5 games. Until he starts wearing size 38 jeans like the rest of you keyboard jockeys, he is still gonna be fast.

by Happy Time Harry on Apr 19, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Not true...

I’ve been to several actually. However, no A-Day game was this hyped before and if anything it was worse than those before.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well that’s you’re opinion but I’ve never been to an A-day that wasn’t hot and boring

by Happy Time Harry on Apr 19, 2010 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

By the way...

That was a great comment on the size 38 jeans! I looked down at mine and saw they were actually 40’s which made it even better hahaha! I thought, damnit, I’m even more of a fatass than what he said. Well played sir-you rendered me speechless and I had no kind of comeback for that.Trust me, it’s not easy to make me silent and laugh in shame Kudos to you Harry. :-)

One last thing, I do hope no one thinks I said Acid isn’t a good writer. I said a few times he is one of the best writers on college football I’ve ever read. And, I’m not one to say idle comments either-he is just damned good.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a legit...

…..complaint on the all caps. I did overuse ‘em! I was pretty fired up. Auburn football! And the fact that CSS delayed the rebroadcast for an hour and a half didn’t help. And then I was ticked off at the pass defense. So yeah, I went nuts on my post. Sorry!

…..Last year when I attended A-Day, I had the “you mean that’s it?” reaction when it was over in two hours, too. Considering that all the practices are closed, you want everything you can get on A-Day! We were pretty strong up front on D, and that includes backup linemen and linebackers that shut down the run. On the other hand the O-line was getting outnumbered on inside runs. Most teams would go nickel against what we were showing offensively Saturday.

……What I posted is just the opinion of an armchair quarterback watching the game one time. I hope folks enjoy it, but it’s hardly a Phil Steele breakdown! I had a roster printed out, but there were a lot of number that played that weren’t on it. No names were on the jerseys. A lot of the time, I didn’t have a clue who made the tackle.

…..McCalebb did not look fat. He doesn’t have the burst of a year ago, though. They mostly pounded him into the line in this one, and it didn’t work.

by Acid Reign on Apr 20, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Fair Enough man

And, I did go overboard a bit with what I said. Sorry about that mate, I love your stuff normally man. Anyway, I look forward to your next article man and I do love this site or I wouldn’t be on it all the time. Heh heh.

by Sparkey on Apr 20, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ah yes...

Such a great quote from good ole AI. That one did trip me out when he said it. Actually, I always thought he had good reason not to push himself that hard during practice despite Larry Brown’s anger. Though, the Answer’s attitude was terrible and him not playing because he wanted to still be a starter at this point in his career is simply a microcosm of his life it seemed. Has anyone ever seen him wearing a Georgetown hat or shirt?

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Rude

If you pay for something you have a right to question the quality of the product. If you don’t pay and it’s given freely go somewhere else if you don’t like it.

Imagine a neighborhood kid coming over and mowing an elderly neighbor’s yard with no prompting or asking for compensation. Now imagine that the elderly widow comes out and bitches the kid out for not pulling out some weeds when he was mowing. Rude right? Stop acting like and elderly bitchy woman.

Thanks Acid- I always appreciate your insight and I enjoyed THIS article.

Hating Lowder since 1993.

by pmikler on Apr 19, 2010 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

great effort here acid... and good thoughts all.

i can appreciate lots of these viewpoints on the QBs and Omac… we’ll have to see which one sticks. i wondered watching my taped bama spring game if Fannin & Omac would get organized dual back style similar to the uses that were shown by bama’s spring game for ingram / richardson. richardson was used most as a dual threat-run catch back and ran most to the outside.

i saw Omac shoot out of the backfield on several plays for routes and with WR blockers in front …this is a good play for AU. he’s going to get hit by some LBs… and i like his weight just as it is. (185-190 up from 175/180 last year) of course, Fannin will have the background to run pass routes and hurt defenses also.

the piece of this article that i connected with most as i was watching the game was the intermediate pass attack personnel- lutzenkirchen, burns, & e. smith. these guys didn’t seem in the offensive scheme much at all. i view these guys as great opportunities this year with such a WR corp that can stretch (by the way, i really noticed a wide spacing of WR sets used in the game) the defense and open up stuff in the mid range passing game.

i thought caudle did stare down his WR, in some cases…they had created separation so early in their routes that the QBs didn’t have many progressions to go thru. i agree, we need to see the starters match up against one another to better evaluate where the team is, but i trust the coaches for protecting the team and keeping the players healthy.

after all, can you imagine being a player and getting hurt in one of these scrimmages before the season even starts… before you even have the chance to hit someone other than a teammate?

wappa

by buddy Ro on Apr 19, 2010 3:57 PM CDT reply actions  

My biggest gripe with A-Day and its aftermath.

No starting QB. This is a problem that I wish Auburn could deal with. I mean, aren’t we a big enough program to have stability at this position? Tubbs really mishandled his recruiting in this aspect.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

I agree with you.

Then again, after 2004, he really left our guys in a heap of a mess and got off with 5 million dollars, got to analyze ESPN for a year, and now is the Head Coach at Texas Tech making a splash out there. I’m not saying Auburn was right in the whole thing, but it’s not like he was left homeless with nothing to eat and nowhere to go. Honestly, of all the qb’s I saw, I think Trotter will end up being the best of the bunch. He reminds me a lot of Dan Marino like a couple of others have said. I’m not saying he’ll be anywhere close to Dan, I’m just saying I think he’ll be a badass.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 6:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like the Newton/Trotter/Moseley combo all the way around.

It looks like we finally have some guys who can throw the ball and make smart plays (maybelike Campbell?) and aren’t slower than their own lineman (Brandon Cox anyone?)

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 19, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would to agree again sir.

I too like the triple threat. Moseley looks pretty good too and he’s really going to improve I think. I’m happy with those three guys and I think Auburn will be okay for the next few years.

by Sparkey on Apr 19, 2010 7:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Acid I have a question about your article.

In the last paragraph before the jump, you mention the D only managing 9 sacks. I think that’s decent considering Roof could only bring 4 rushers and a lot of qb’s were ‘downed’ after crossing the line of scrimmage.

Why do you see this as so problematic?

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 20, 2010 7:15 AM CDT reply actions  

9 sacks and 50

……pass attempts isn’t bad at all. A couple of years ago, there would have been a lot more. The reason isn’t on the defense. This year’s bunch of quarterbacks had a hot route to go to with pressure in their face, and the hot receiver was usually open. We really didn’t pass block well.

by Acid Reign on Apr 20, 2010 8:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, I understand that Acid.

I guess the way it was worded made me think you were ripping the defense. I was thinking that was a good number considering. Looks like we were on the same page, just maybe in different dialects, haha. Have a good one Acid.

War Eagle

by WarEagle86 on Apr 20, 2010 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Auburn's Oldest and Most Read Independent Blog

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tom_of_the_jungle_small
Here's one thing we can do!
Koolbell_and_tootie_in_auburn_small
Stefon Diggs Announcement Thread
Acid_reign_small
Q&A about Ted Roof!
Colkilgore_small
Jordan Moore picks TCU
Squidbillie_small
Will The Real Nick Saban Please Stand Up?
Aulogo_small
What will Auburn's new offense look like?
_vc00396_small
Why your quarterback should be the best player on your team
Img_2302_small
Is Cameron Auburn's New Offensive Coordinator?
_vc00396_small
Jay Prosch, Great Blocker and Great Kid
Colkilgore_small
Gregg Knapp of Texans as OC??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Headshot_small Jay Coulter

Gg455b_small War Eagle Atlanta

Acid_reign_small Acid Reign

Img_8384-3_small aubtigerman

Koolbell_and_tootie_in_auburn_small KoolBell777