From Champ to Chump?

I don't wanna get carried away, but...
Jay's mention yesterday of the curious case of Will Muschamp possibly being the Horns' understudy in Austin for a bit longer than he originally bargained for got me thinking about a host of things--including his prime point of the whole coach-in-waiting, coach-on-deck concept. While Jay doesn't like the idea, I think that in the right situation, it can help bridge the gap for a successful transition--provided it's done quickly and you don't have an Al Haig situation arise. Recruits and your fan base need to know who the successor will be immediately, even if a retirement is announced in good time, and truth be told, most would prefer an orderly line of succession as opposed to the chaos of the great coaching hunt in a bear market.
But the potential to botch such an undertaking is tremendous--witness the example of FSU and Bobby Bowden. Can't empathize with the Noles? Imagine that Tubs had taken Chizik in as a successor back in the 2006 season, but still got shoved out the door after the Alabama loss in 2008. Would Mean Gene have an easier go at it than the situation that he did walk into, or would it have been worse? I'm thinking the latter situation. Half the fan base that even approved of the firing would still view Chizik as a possible Brutus, with his long knife drawn. That kind of division could take years to mend, even with all the right moves that we now know Chizik can make. And that's not factoring in the freedom that comes with a wholesale house cleaning. Inheriting a program may come with pressure to keep certain members of the coaching staff on board for political reasons--and the new staff may not gel as quickly. Let's see how many members of Jimbo Fisher's staff remain for the 2011 or 2012 season.
So back to Muschamp. The current anointed one. The hottest assistant in the country. The hottest head coaching prospect in the country. Or is he? What's he waiting on? This is a business based in large part on hype, and if you look up depreciating asset in the dictionary, it says, see HYPE. Could this be a failure to launch scenario? 2008--Auburn offers him a job in the $3M range--turned down, but understandably so, given his intimate knowledge of the dysfunction under Bobby Lowder and the pressures applied to his former boss on the Plains. In 2009, the SEC went into December looking like it would have zero coaching turnover, but ended up with the Kiffin surprise. Tennessee offered Muschamp the job, and he declined. Knoxville is the historical #2 team in the conference and a top 10 program in the nation. If you don't jump on a job like that, what exactly do you think is coming around the bend?
But maybe we're selling young Muschamp short. So many SECers think his place is in the conference, but perhaps it's not. Maybe he simply intends to honor his current agreement and remain the coach-in-waiting for Texas and the highest-paid assistant in the country. Seems sort of strange these days, though. Someone in a high-profile profession like this sticks to their word. Stranger things do happen--the whole aforementioned Lane Kitten nightmare, for one. But apparently, the wait might get a little bit longer in Austin, so what's plan B? Damn. That Tennessee job sure is looking good now if there's a logjam at DKR Stadium. See, at some point, you burn up all your political capital and go from being the next best thing to simply being a prude. So many have asked, yet you've never agreed. Eventually you're all dressed up with nowhere to go.
Carpe diem! You don't get to walk this way again, especially with more and more of the upper crust of BCS conferences eschewing the hiring of hot prospect assistants and going with someone who has proven his mettle as the head guy--even if it is at a mid-major school. Let's look at Alabama, LSU, Florida, Tennessee, Georgia and us the last decade or so. Only one of those group hired a top assistant that worked out and that was Georgia. Mark Richt came from FSU and made an immediate impact. Alabama hired Shula, an assistant in the NFL, and most Tide fans would agree that was an unmitigated disaster. Florida hired Zook and took a break from winning conference championships for four years. Auburn would have bucked conventional wisdom by wanting to hire Muschamp, but couldn't. Do many Tiger fans think that breaking him in would have been the right decision for us? Tough to say. Granted, on the other hand, with only two years in Ames, Iowa, most would agree that Chizik was probably a little wet around the ears, too.
But hiring someone with HC experience is by no means a lock. At LSU, Saban came from mediocre success at Michigan State before taking over the reigns, and Les Miles came from same at Oklahoma State. Both won MNCs in Baton Rouge. Alabama hired a proven college winner in Saban after struggling with Dennis Franchione out of TCU and Mike Price out of Washington State. Georgia struggled under Jim Donnan from Marshall but Florida took an upstart Urban Meyer from Utah and Auburn borrowed Tubs from Ole Miss. Tennessee has now hired Derek Dooley from Louisiana Tech, but opted for the hot assistant with Muschamp to no avail. So okay, maybe the concept's not totally dead, but they better be on-fire hot.
But maybe Will Muschamp has more patience than Jobe and the steely resolve of a sniper and is waiting for his opportunity to arise. Last year, we saw serious chinks in Mark Richt's armor for the first time and not even DC Willie Martinez's head on a pike can quell all Dawg fans for long, especially if things turn sour again this fall. If Richt were to become vulnerable later in the upcoming season, would Georgia be tempted to make a move? I can't imagine a scenario yet where Richt would be fired outright, so inroads would have to be made to Muschamp, whom I'm sure still maintains close Bulldog ties. That fact would certainly make it easier on them than possibly having their own version of Jetgate, but the answer must be known before the question is formally asked and the head made to roll. Are Dawg fans bullish on Muschamp, or are they really not that into him? Makes you also wonder if Gator fans will ever be interested in Chizik, but I digress.
If such an offer is made and accepted, it'll either be the swiftest move ever by a HC or the luckiest CFB happenstance since Ronald Regan played the Gipper. One thing is certain, though. It'll restore the old anachronistic concept of an alumnus coach in the SEC. 2009 was the first season in my lifetime that there wasn't a HC storming the very sidelines that he used to sit on as a player and that's kinda sad if you think about it.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Maybe.....
Muschamp is just one of the few people left in the world who actually honors a contract.
If he were he would have honored his contract with AU.......
and not bolted for Texas in the first place.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Great Read WEA, plenty of food for thought on several levels.
However, I just think Muschamp knows he has got the best situation for an assistant in the country. Although if UGA came a calling, there would have to be be alot of prayer time in the Muschamp household.
At present, he receives a gauranteed base of $900,000.00 per yr. + bonuses, which is automatically renewed every year (making him one of the two highest paid asst. coach in the nation). If Brown exits, Will would get $ 2 million per yr + bonuses as HC. If he is not the HC by 2013, that portion of his contract will be renegotiated at a figure higher than $2.5 Million. In addition, there is no buyout clause in his contract, should another school wished to hire him away from Texas.
It appears that he holds all the cards to his future. He is one of two of the highest paid assistants in the country, He is the coach in waiting for what may be the best HC job in the country , if measured soley by financial security (Mack Brown is the nation’s highest paid coach at $5 million per yr. + bonuses). Add to that the fact that he does not have a buyout in the event he should decide he would like to go somewhere esle. And further, what I know is a major factor….. that his wife is not interested in moving anymore around the country on the coaches carosel, and you have a guy that probably is going to be at Texas for a long time. He and his wife feel like they have definetly found their home in Austin.
I strongly believe that he is in the position he is in for two reasons : one is because they like very much what they see in Will Muschamp and two they do not want to lose him like they did Gene Chizik.
aubtigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT
Thanks au-t-man ...
… for the T+C info. It confirms what I figured — Muschamp is firmly in control of his future and being very well paid for his effort.
And, I’ll say this about what I’ve observed about the … on-the-job-Coach-Will-Muschamp … at every coaching stop he’s made: He’s always earned his money. He doesn’t shut it down on his present job even when he’s looking at other options elsewhere. He’s focused on making his unit better on the field and off the field. He’s been able to work with his peer coaches. He’s not worried about getting all the credit. He doesn’t point fingers of blame in public at his players, his peers, nor his bosses. And he doesn’t run — his family members, or his agent, or anybody else — out to speak for him in public & then give some lame Plausible-Deniability-Head-Fake-Response himself. And, he produces results!!
For all the chatter about loyalty & such, I’d bet that he hasn’t ‘burned any bridges’ with anybody he’s ever worked for.
The only bad thing I’ve ever heard about him is that Brother Oliver goes around saying … every chance he gets … that, “Coach Will Muschamp learned everything he knows from his mentor Coach Brother Oliver.” Now that’s a heavy burden to carry. :-)
Let's not forget that Muschamp has a pretty sweet gig.
It’s not like he’s working in the mail room making minimum wage and he’s waiting to become CEO.
He’s making about $1M a year I think, and I think I’ve heard that his contract for him becoming head coach will only increase his salary to $2M a year.
Wow, aubtigerman just stole my thunder…
Anyway, the dude is under much less pressure where he is now and what can you buy with $2mil a year that you can’t buy with $1mil a year?
He’s still plenty young and has 20 good years of coaching ahead of him easy.
I think he will entertain offers from UGA and LSU should those jobs open up. Both rosters will be stacked if their HC’s leave in the next year or two. They will be much easier turn around jobs that Auburn was a year ago.
Don’t worry WEA…Mushchamp is in control here.
Things might have changed this offseason
A year ago, Muschamp looked like he was only a few years from taking the HC gig at Texas, now that’s been put on indefinite hold. It might be harder for him to turn down UGa or LSU, two schools he has ties to, now that he knows he’s not getting Mack Brown’s job for a long time.
Fake Pundit. Real Fan.
http://www.andthevalleyshook.com
Just as supporting evidence to Poseur and my point...
Bill King specifically mentioned LSU and UGA as landing points for Muschamp should one or both of those teams have total collapses this year and be looking to make a change.
However, I think Miles and Richt both have AT LEAST two seasons left, because it is unlikely either team finishes worse than 4-4 in conference this year. 4-4 in conference is not bad enough for these two guys to get canned, they have earned more slack than that.
He will stay at Texas until Brown leaves or Richt gets canned
outside of that, I don’t see him leaving
You know
The more I hear about the guy, the more I can’t figure him. He’s always got some sort of angle somewhere. Who knows, it may actually be crazy enough to be true, he doesn’t want to head coach all that badly. I mean, what if he enjoys being an assistant and simply does not want to be a head coach. You think he may believe he’s not ready for it yet or want that kind of pressure? I mean, I can understand turning Auburn down, but he would’ve had everything he wanted at Tennessee. He would’ve gotten to come there while the program hated their former coach. You can’t go to a school at a better time. When Muschamp steps in for Brown, he has giant shoes to fill. He might not be that welcoming to such pressure. For that matter, trying to save AU or UT may not have been what he wanted to do. I realize that doesn’t seem so what with him being the head coach in waiting, but if the guy really wanted something else, I think he would’ve gone on already. Of course, this is pure speculation on my part. I guess I’m just tossing out a different theory that most haven’t considered yet. He doesn’t really want to be a head coach as much as he wants to control the defense and get the best recruits for that side of the ball. I could be way off track here, though.
I think a lot of people, including Muschamp,
thought Brown would be gone either by now or within a year or so. But when he signed that extension it caught a lot of people off guard. I think Texas wanted to lock him down so badly that they maybe stretched the truth a bit about Browns departure.
Like you, I agree that the coach in waiting can be a good thing when done appropriately. OTS over at our site wrote a piece on the chaos that faced the Alabama athletic department after Bear left, and it is easy to see that Bama didnt have much of a plan afterwards as everyone was vying for power (and Bear basically ran the athletic department as a one man show for lack of a better example). He also brought up the concept of us needing to start laying the foundation for Saban’s departure/retirement now in order to avoid much of the shenanigans that have plagued us the past thirty years. In that respect I think the CIW is a good idea.
Another example is Jimbo Fisher at FSU. That was, what, three years? Seems to have worked out well and helped reinvigorate a program that ran stale over the past few years while maintaining the sense of legacy associated with Bowden and keeping recruits interested (relatively) in the FSU program. All in all, I could foresee many more coaches in waiting if coaches find tenure and remain at one institution for a long period of time and the foundation is based more on the FSU model rather than the UT model.
I think at UT there were/are good intentions, but it has remained to be seen whether both sides are on the same accord.
www.RollBamaRoll.com - Our logo has more championships than you
Somebody always seems to be able to snap the most embarassing photos of AU coaches.

What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
looks like he’s trying to get a popcorn kernel out of his teeth lol.
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
Looks like he tastes something......
and it’s not a popcorn kernel. Don’t ask don’t tell…….at Bama.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
apologies for the subtitle. I just didn’t feel like finding the original and uploading it. For what it’s worth though, even my auburn buddies thought it was funny.
There’s also that pick of chizik doing the high 5 in his office. Funny stuff.
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
nah, we got 13. And none of them are "people's" or "RPI" or awarded by some podunk newspaper in south alabama.
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
Zoltar...
If USC is forced to vacate wins in the 2004 season, would you have a problem if Auburn were to actually claim a MNC if some of the selectors change their votes?
Never before in the field of CFB recruiting, has much much been accomplished by so few, in the face of so many...
by War Eagle Atlanta on May 21, 2010 9:15 PM CDT up reply actions
what selectors? There’s the BCS and the AP. I can’t see the BCS giving their trophy to a team that wasn’t even in the game. They basically have two choices. Give it to Oklahoma or not have a BCS champion that year (assuming USC has to vacate). If the AP has a revote and puts you number one, then by all means claim it. They did a revote for NFL rookie of the year, but I’m not sure if they would go back six years to have a revote.
Regardless, I’m not sure the NCAA is going to vacate wins from 04. Bush’s dealings with that Lloyd character didn’t start until 05 if what I hear is correct.
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill

by 














