Tigers Hang on in Starkville!
War Eagle, everybody! It's time now for some belated grades on last Thursday's Auburn visit to Mississippi State. The Tigers held on after scoring no points in the second half, and beat Mississippi State 17-14. Most folks expected a lot of offensive fireworks in this game, but that's not what happened. Instead, the teams combined for only 594 total yards and 31 points. We were treated to inconsistent passing games, with many errant passes and a number of dropped balls. The game was won by Auburn on defensive line play. In what was supposed to be a pretty even matchup, the Auburn defensive line camped out in the Bulldog backfield and made life miserable for the Bulldog quarterbacks.
The expected offensive explosion by the Tiger offense never happened. At times the Auburn offense seemed on the verge, such as Emory Blake's early break away screen reception for a touchdown. The Tigers moved the ball for 348 total yards, but regularly killed drives with penalties, errant passes, or whiffed blocks. Injuries to senior starters Mario Fannin and Lee Ziemba did not help, either. Honestly, it looked like Gus Malzhan kept the playbook simple for the second week in a row. How else to explain pounding a 180 pound tailback with footing problems into a stout Bulldog line time and time again? For the second week in a row, quarterback Cameron Newton was the leading Tiger rusher, tallying 70 yards on 18 carries. Here's hoping the injured Tigers get well, and the playbook expands for the Clemson game next weekend!
For much of the game, the Auburn front seven on defense was a FORCE. Tackle Nick Fairley shredded a double team block time and time again, tallying two and a half tackles for a loss, a fumble recovery, and an interception. Fairley also added three quarterback hurries, a conservative count. Auburn was also effective taking away the deep pass. The longest Bulldog pass of the day to a wide receiver was only 17 yards to Chris Smith early in the first quarter. When the game was on the line at the end, it was the Auburn defense that came up with the game-winning stops.
Auburn special teams took a step backwards in this game. Ball security woes returned on the punt return unit, as Quindarius Carr attempted to field a punt in traffic, fumbled, and gave the Bulldogs the ball on the Auburn 20 yard line. The Bulldogs would score a few plays later to tie the game. A Wes Byrum field goal attempt was blocked in the 4th quarter. The Tigers allowed Leon Berry a 31 yard kick return to start the second half. That momentum carried the Bulldogs to an opening drive touchdown. It wasn't all bad on special teams. The Berry return aside, kick and punt coverage was pretty good. Wes Byrum averaged kicking off to the 3 yard line. Ryan Shoemaker consistently pinned the Bulldogs deep with his towering punts. Only one of his four was even returnable.
Unit Grades, after the jump!
Defensive Line: A-. I counted off on a few runs up the middle that gashed Auburn. One of these was a shovel pass up the gut off a sprint option. Also, when MSU went to flexbone look for a while, fullback Patrick Hanrahan smashed for 21 yards on 3 carries. Why the Bulldogs abandoned this attack, I have no idea. We certainly had no answer for it! Largely silent against ASU last week, Zach Clayton, Michael Goggins and Mike Blanc all turned in fine games, as did some of the true freshmen reserves in limited minutes. Nick Fairley and Antoine Carter were at times unblockable in this one.
Linebackers: B+-. We still need Craig Stevens out there to get us lined up correctly, but the linebackers held their own pretty well. Eltoro Freeman led the team in tackles with 9, and Josh Bynes added six. Bynes had an absolutely critical stop for no gain on a shovel pass late in the game. The Bulldogs had burned Auburn with it earlier, but the second time Bynes was waiting on it.
Secondary: C+. You have to credit the Auburn secondary for not giving up any play longer than 22 yards, but we were still out of position at times, and are still giving up too much cushion on the edges. Some of that was likely the scheme. The Bulldogs did try to hurt Auburn like ASU did, with quick passes to the outside. They only completed about one in four of those, which won't consistently move the chains. For every caught ball, there was a drop, a wild throw that had no chance, or an Auburn defender actually in position to make a play. We're still not consistent at all in our coverage technique.
Punting: B. You'd like more distance, as Ryan Shoemaker managed only 39.2 yards on 4 kicks. However, two of those were downed inside the 20, and only one was returned for 4 yards. That's a decent night.
Punt Returns: D. The biggest error here was the fumble by Quindarius Carr, but that wasn't the only thing wrong. The blocking again was lacking. Out of seven punts by the Bulldogs, Carr only successfully fielded one for 11 yards. Even if he has to fair catch every one, we can't turn it over, and we don't need to let them hit and roll.
Kick Returns: C. Demond Washington had two pretty nice returns for a 32 yard average. However, the return team was caught asleep on the onside kickoff after the second half score. While we can argue that perhaps the ball didn't go ten yards and the play should have been reviewed, you can't let teams that have just scored do that.
Place-kicking: B. Wes Byrum did provide the winning margin on a second quarter field goal. We had a field goal attempt blocked in the 4th quarter. It was a long attempt, and the trajectory on those is lower by design. However, it's fair to say that the interior line just flat opened the gate on that play. We've got to shore up our blocking here.
Offensive Line: C+. I've seen rave reviews of the Auburn tackle play in this game, so much so that I have to wonder if I actually saw the same game. From my perspective, no one could control Bulldog end Pernell McPhee. Ziemba was having trouble with him before the injury, and A.J. Green REALLY had his hands full when McPhee lined up on the strong side. Ziemba's replacement Brandon Moseley was ok on run blocks, but had the corner turned on him by Bulldog ends in pass protection. Ryan Pugh had a solid game, but we missed too many blocks from the guards.
Receivers: B. Blocking by the receivers wasn't nearly as good in this game as in the ASU game, but we did better as far as not dropping the ball. Darvin Adams made a great catch on a high ball in the end zone. Kodi Burns did a nice job on the throwback pass, lofting it over a defender and giving Cameron Newton room to run.
Running Backs: C+. It's never a good sign when none of the running backs can out rush the quarterback. Here's my vote for seeing a lot more of Michael Dyer next week. One of the knocks against Dyer is pass protection, but I didn't see much better from McCalebb or Eric Smith. The lead blocking by Smith in this game was one of his worst. Onterrio McCalebb seems to be having an ongoing traction problem, frequently tripping over yard lines. With this problem, AND his small stature, I really don't understand running him into the line repeatedly. With the injury to Mario Fannin's shoulder, we are really getting thin at tailback. Here's hoping Mario recovers quickly!
Quarterback: B. Newton survived his first SEC road start with only one turnover, and that one was a deep bomb to the opponent's end zone. While it shouldn't have been floated into double coverage, it was hardly a critical mistake. I could trot out the "same as a punt" sentiment. Newton had some missed throws, but he also made a few. While the miss out of bounds at the 5 to a wide open Jay Wisner hurt, there was the quick screen for the early score, and the dart to Adams in the end zone. Newton also checked down successfully to Zachary several times on the come-back route. Even though it wasn't a banner day, Newton hit 57 percent of his passes for 7.1 yards per pass. Add in 70 more rushing yards, and it's a decent day for his first start against BCS competition. Newton did tally 228 total yards. Other first timer Auburn quarterbacks in the past decade haven't done so well. There was Jason Campbell's 4 fumbles in the Carrier Dome, and Brandon Cox's 4 picks against Georgia Tech, for example. Newton took the trip to Starkville against a good Bulldog team, and won. This quarterback is a keeper!
Despite the closeness of the victory, a win is a win. This team is still improving, and has a great chance to take a further leap against Clemson next Saturday. A defense that can hold on and win a game is a luxury that we did not have last season. Here's hoping that the secondary coaches work the entire week on man coverage. We'll face a dangerous gunslinger in Kyle Parker, who was an All-American in two sports last season. The Auburn defense will have its hands full with Dabo Sweeney's offense.
The offense needs to open up the playbook for the next two games. Clemson should be pretty confident coming in to Jordan Hare, and frankly South Carolina looks like the best of the SEC East, at this point. The next two weeks will really determine if we have a New Year's Day Bowl kind of season, or a Liberty/Independence disappointment. I'll repeat my earlier request that we see a lot more of Michael Dyer this week. If Marcus Lattimore can put up 188 against Georgia, I think Dyer can as well. They are running backs of a similar caliber. War Eagle, and beat Clemson!
--
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great read Acid.
We were all pleasntly surprised by the Defense. What a game Fairley had. Except for the one muffed punt by Carr, I still have confidence that he can be a good punt returner.
We definitely are missing a runner (like Tate) that can pound it in to the line. I suspect now that the reason Mario only got three carries in the first game is the coaches may have been trying to give a sore shoulder (from a practice injury?)time to heal.
Anyway we need to find someone that can assume that inside running game besides Newton. It doesn’t matter how big he is, it’s not good to have your QB pounding the middle of the line for 12 games. We don’t need to take chances on an injury. If it’s Dyer, Phllips, or someone else – I don’t care, as long as we get someone to step up. Looking forward to beating our little Tiger brother. Bring on Clemson. War Eagle !
AubTigerman
"The reason you come to Auburn is because of Auburn people.This is a special place, from the coaches all the way to the fans" - Andrew McCain OT
as always great analysis.
My two thoughts. 1) We don’t need a running quarterback. It’s great that we have one, no doubt, but A) We have a great line, great WR’s, and potentially great RB’s and B) If Newton gets injured we’re roasty toasty. I love watching the man play but I sure hope Gus is working on ways to establish a legit running game and maximizing Adams and co. 2) Kodi Burns needs to block, not pass. Every time he throws it I worry and have to get another coldie from the fridge. War Eagle, can’t wait for saturday!
Great Read Acid and Great Comments Free James
Your thoughts hit the nail on the head. We have prob. have the second best back field in the league along with a good corps of receivers. Cam should only run if he is under pressure. Thursday just looked sloppy and bad all around. Does it appear to any besides me that Cam looks lackadaisical or like he is not giving a 100% when he runs the ball sometimes? It may just be his size causing that impression. Anyways, we got an important win. Clemson’s QB scares me considering the way our secondary has been playing. WDEH.
by footballlegends on Sep 12, 2010 7:38 PM CDT reply actions
I don't think it's laziness or anything..
I’ve witnessed lots of big guys run, and they sometimes look slow. Add to that the factor of looking for open space while your running, and everybody will slow down.
Example: A sprinter only looks up to see that they are in the correct lane, a running back has to be able to find space and cut to where the open part of the field exists. No matter how quick the cut speed is sacrificed.
I am worried about running in the QB position will hurt in the long run, but more worried about OMac tripping over thin air. There were ample opportunities for big chunks of yardage, even up the middle. McCalebb just seemed to have terrible footing for the second week in a row.
Come and join me at http://trackemtigers.com
Your right
I have never seen the kid in person. That’s prob. the reason i under-estimate his size.
by footballlegends on Sep 12, 2010 9:21 PM CDT up reply actions
I've got no problem at all...
…..with how Cam runs. He picks his holes, and you see defenders bounding off. That, my friends, is called momentum!
…..If Cam DOES go down to injury, I don’t think we’re necessarily in huge trouble. He’s a big ace, to be sure, but remember: we had several guys look good running the offense last spring. I think either Barrett Trotter or Neil Caudle could effectively lead this offense, or even possibly Clint Moseley. Caudle has pretty good speed on the scramble, I think.
……For now, I’ll stick to my belief that the playbook has been dumbed down for the first two games, because we knew we would win.
Question
Has Auburn ever had a Newton like QB in its history? I feel that in our recent past we have just had pocket passers mostly.
From a skillset point...
we had Dameyune Craig…he could run and throw equally well. But from a physical standpoint with that particular skillset….that would be a big “hell no”.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
Newton....
…..is a lot bigger than Craig was. Craig was about 5’ 10" or 5"11 and maybe 210 at most. He was elusive, but not a power runner at all.
…..Charles Thomas, who started in 1979 and 180 was of a similar size to Newton, relative to the players of the time. Not as big as Newton, of course, but you didn’t have 300 pound linemen in the 1970s, either. Thomas could ran, and had a great arm. We didn’t coach the passing game well at all, during the Barfield era. Thomas got in the doghouse with the Dye administration, and I think left the team early in 1981. I think he caught on as a DB with the Seahawks for a while after that.
I had forgotten about Charles Thomas......
and he couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn from ten yards away is the reason he “got in the doghouse”. Not that Pat Dye was looking for a pure passer but Charles Thomas couldn’t keep a defense honest with even the threat of a pass. But you are spot on about Craig….which is why I differentiated him from a physical standpoint from Newton. Dameyune could give a defense fits though by turning a broken play that would look like a loss into a first down or a score…..and he was very accurate with his passes.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
D
Great job Acid. My thoughts: A lot of people are saying that if it weren’t for dropped balls we would have lost, etc. This may be true, but alot of the drops were put in very tough spots because Relf was under a lot of pressure. It seemed to me like they got into his head. The defensive line definitely made a difference, forcing errant throws. Great job by the D. This is a game that we would have lost last year…The defense always seemed to fold at any sign of adversity in 09. Well, this time, they got the ball back after an interception, forced a 3 and out after the onsides kick, and recovered to make a stop after that (bullshit) penalty on the last drive. I like it.
by Brandon Moseley on Sep 13, 2010 12:27 AM CDT reply actions
There was certainly...
…..a lack of consistency going on with the Bulldog skill players all around. I’d imagine having Nick Fairley beat on you will cause that! Folk can trot out the “if not for the drops” line, but there were plenty of bad passes, too. What also I probably didn’t emphasize enough is that our secondary “defended” a lot of those passes. The receiver got popped after the catch. That plays on a receiver’s mind, I think.
…..I’ve watched A LOT of college football over the past 10-12 days. Seems to me that short of outright tackling the receiver, pass interference isn’t being called. This is pretty much a national trend. I’ve seen early contact, hands on the shoulder, arms draped around the receiver, that sort of thing, and never a call. Did Neiko get there early? Maybe. You’d have to super slo-mo it to be sure. He had his back to the QB. The official guessed. Period. Why let secondary muggings go on much of the game, then make that ticky-tack call?
……Another thing I noticed is what I’d term “fall-downs.” There are a number of teams trying to run up-tempo offenses. At critical times against such teams, a guy would get “hurt.” This would stop the clock, and you’d see a frantic clipboard session on the sideline. The injured player would sit out the required play, then be right back in there with no apparent ill effects. Yeah. I can see certain coaches trying this against the Malzhan offense down the road. There’s no real recourse, either. To a certain extent, it was good to see that Gus can see the strategy in some circumstances of just milking the clock. For a while last Thursday, it was almost like watching the Borges/Cox offense. Cam and co. don’t QUITE have the timing down, yet. Those Tiger offenses in the Borges could snap that ball with only 0.00000000001 seconds left on the play clock. I can’t tell you how many times we watched that clock with a growing sense of panic!
Where's the speed?
I thought Gus’s offense depended on unrelenting speed, running play after play to confuse and wear down the opposing defense. It could have been my imagination but it seemed to take forever from one play to the next and we never caught the defense out of position or wore them down. That’s great for letting our defense recover but seems to decrease the effectiveness of our offensive strategy.
Good analysis as always Acid....
I will make one comment about the offensive line….AJ Greene better shape up or we could have a definitive problem running to the weak side. And my comment for the otherwise pleasant performance of the defense…….Goggins needs to be more physical and take advantage of Fairley being double teamed they handled him with one blocker pretty much most of the night. And Nick Fairley is a beast…a one man wrecking crew.
I would have gone to bammer if my grades hadn't been good enough to go to AU
I agree about Nick Fairley Todd.
Damn, that guy is a man hard to keep away from the play. I love calling him Mount Fairley and pissing off my Alabama friends. They really hate that. I think you’ll see Brandon Moseley come in for AJ Greene soon enough along with Dyer’s touches steadily increasing in number. I’m surprised with Goggins not getting anymore pressure than he does. In fact, our defensive end play has not been that stellar compared to our tackles. I think you’ll see teams start going outside more, and that won’t help too much either as Auburn does have much better speed. By the way, the tackles do seem to be getting at least a little better what do you think? I also think Stevens comes back this game and that will be a difference maker there. He and Bynes and Bates and Freeman all on the field at once is a pretty potent set of linebackers in my view. Freeman seems to be improving each game.
I just hope our offense does better this time around, but I actually do trust Malzhan. I mean, he gets it done wherever he goes, so I have to think things will pick up again against Clemson. Reed will also see the field and that’s exciting.

by 


















