Best and Worst-Case Scenarios for the Tigers in 2011
via www.sectalk.com
2010 was a great year for the Auburn Tigers. 53 years of heartbreak and being so-close-yet-so-far-away paid off, as the Tigers had the perfect storm -- 24 seniors, a manageable schedule that put a majority of the big games in the welcome confines of Jordan-Hare Stadium, an eventual All-American defensive tackle who emerged at the right time and the arrival of an unknown JUCO quarterback named Cameron Newton.
Of course, the Tigers won the long-coveted BCS National Championship. The Heisman Trophy made its first apperance in Auburn since 1985. Auburn finally had its day in the sun.
So.... now what?
Heading into 2011, the Tigers lose over 30 players from the 2010 team, including Newton, Nick Fairley, most of the offensive and defensive lines, several wide receivers and plenty of other key contributors. The schedule includes road games at Clemson, South Carolina, Arkansas, LSU and Georgia and home games against Mississippi State, Florida and Alabama. Out of those eight teams, seven want revenge from 2010 (the lone exception being Florida). There are only 74 scholarship players on the roster. On the two-deep depth chart, 17 of 26 players are underclassmen.
In college football, of course, games aren't won on paper. If they were, the sport would be much less interesting and entertaining. If they were, Auburn would be following up its 14-0 2010 season with a 6-6 or 7-5 2011 season. Out of the three big preseason magazines (Phil Steele, Athlon and Lindy's), Auburn is picked to go 6-6 in all of them. Two of the three magazines pick the Tigers to finish 5th in the West, while Phil Steele picks Auburn to finish dead-last in college football's best division.
But in college football, anything is possible. Auburn could capitalize on its talent and coaching or could fail on its inexperience and lack of depth.
2011 Scenarios after the Jump
Best-Case Scenario: 10-2, Sugar Bowl
It's reaching a bit, and is certainly not likely. It would be an amazing coaching job by Gene Chizik and his staff if the Tigers could pull this off with such a lack of depth and experience. This can only be a result if: a) Talented youngsters grow up quickly, b) Alabama and LSU struggle with QB play, or c) Gene Chizik pulls off a Coach-of-the-Year-Award-winning 2011 campaign.
Worst-Case Scenario: 5-7, No Bowl
Many think the Tigers will be the first team since the 1946 Ohio State Buckeyes to have a losing record the year after winning a national championship. The Longhorns of Texas showed last year that you can't ride the previous season into the new season, as Mack Brown's team went from 13-1 and a BCS Championship appearance to 5-7 and a lot of criticism. This scenario is doubtful for Auburn, but it is possible. Would a 5-7 record mean the team is bad? Not exactly. With so much youth, even if Auburn misses out on a bowl, the Tigers could be returning as many as 18 starters in 2012, not to mention adding what will likely be the Tigers' third consecutive top 10 recruiting class (the 2011 class was ranked #1 in the nation by Scout). I'm sure Auburn fans don't want to see a 5-7 record in 2011, though.
Likely Scenario: Anywhere from 7-9 wins, January Bowl Game
Even with little experience and lack of depth, I think the 2011 Tigers can surprise. The schedule is tough, but I expect Chizik and co. to win 7-9 games, depending on the Iron Bowl result and some key road games. 2012 looks to be a great year, but for now it could be a return trip to the Outback Bowl. With 9 wins, the Tigers could make it to the Capital One Bowl in Orlando or the Cotton Bowl in Arlington.
On paper, it looks like the defending champions will have a rough 2011 and should already be dreaming of 2012. But then again, games aren't won on paper.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I couldn't disagree more....
my best case scenario is we catch lightning in a bottle and go 12-0, my worst case scenario is a 3 loss season.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
You have the right to your own opinion..
I just look at this team and think, “10 wins at best, 5 wins at worst”. The odds of catching lightning in a bottle… well, are the same of literally catching lightning in an empty Coke bottle.
In their respective times at Auburn, both Tuberville and Chizik have defeated 100 Ducks.
I think in order for AU to only have 5 wins would take a meltdown of Tony Franklin proportions.....
so yes I think the worst case of 5 wins is a bit hysterical and overly cautious….and having just seen “lighting in a bottle” last season I’m a little more prone to think it is possible. I have stated all along that I think we go 9-3 or 10-2 realistically…..let us get to LSU undefeated and lightning in a bottle is not so far fetched.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
I agree with you somewhat
I highly doubt we go 5-7. That’s WORST-CASE scenario, if we have serious growing pains. If we make it to Baton Rouge unbeaten, then things will get interesting…
In their respective times at Auburn, both Tuberville and Chizik have defeated 100 Ducks.
My worst case scenario doesn't involve implosion....
because I think our coaching staff is too good to let that happen. My worst case scenario is a slow start with us dropping a game out of our first 4 and having to mature in the meat of the schedule….which I feel is more realistic than the wheels coming off before the Utah State team gets off the plane…which is about what it would take for a 5-7 season to take place….a.k.a. implosion.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
It doesn't have to be an implosion
I doubt Chizik and staff will let it happen. What if our freshmen don’t know how to win those 7 close games we won last year yet, though? Going 5-7 doesn’t always mean you’re bad, it can mean you played well but kep mistakes cost you close games. I doubt we go 5-7, though.
In their respective times at Auburn, both Tuberville and Chizik have defeated 100 Ducks.
Losing 7 close games is pretty much an implosion....
and if Chizik and Co. can’t teach the team to finish in a close game especially after losing a close one then I would have to call that a coaching failure…..after last season and the coaching job that I witnessed I don’t see that as a possibility.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
I think Auburn caught lightning in a bottle LAST year.
Y’all experienced the perfect storm last year and herculean efforts from individual players. I understand confidence, but losing 4 starters from the OL is gonna hurt.
Audemus jura nostra defendere
Every day we make it, we'll make it the best we can.
by animalcracker on Aug 30, 2011 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions
2010 was a perfect storm in every sense of the word...
Even if 2011 is bumpy, 2012 and beyond will be great for Auburn.
In their respective times at Auburn, both Tuberville and Chizik have defeated 100 Ducks.
The future is certainly bright...
but the future starts this season.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
perhaps you didn't see my last post.....
but I said we caught lightning in a bottle last season…..my pretense is that it could happen again but if it doesn’t we are still a 9 or 10 win team.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
It definitely COULD happen again.
My prediction for your Tigers is a “successful” season that leaves a bad taste in your mouth, similar to the one Alabama experienced last year.
Going 10-3 is good, until you consider that we finished 4th in the division and dropped two VERY winnable games to our fiercest rivals.
Audemus jura nostra defendere
Every day we make it, we'll make it the best we can.
by animalcracker on Aug 30, 2011 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Then we certainly are in the same boat.....
that is the most likely scenario only I don’t think that a 9-3 regular season nets us 4th in the west this season like it did for Bama last season simply because I don’t see anyone being undefeated and I don’t see LSU living up to expectations this season because of the turmoil they are having…..Bama is my favorite to win the west but I think even they have a loss on their schedule possibly two.
I don't troll so I reserve the right to berate trolls as I see fit.
Just so you know I won't forget.....LSU Jonno predicted we would finish 5th in the west in '11.
The difference here is...
The expectations are lower than y’alls were last year. No one is predicting another National Championship. In 2010, Alabama fully expected to be in contention for the NC. Even after the South Carolina loss, ESPN kept contemplating ways that a 1-loss Bama team could make it, because CFB’ers thought it was possible. 10-3 would be stellar for a team that is returning 6? (correct me if I’m wrong) starters from last season. Do I think that 10-12 wins is possible? Yes. Likely? No.
The reason that I personally think that we will win at least 7 games is due to the coaching staff we have.
I predict 8 wins for Auburn,
but your four losses come in conference play.
Audemus jura nostra defendere
Every day we make it, we'll make it the best we can.
by animalcracker on Aug 30, 2011 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions
Out of curiosity, who do have us losing to?
I know you already have us losing to Bama, but who are the other 3?
by Tiger on the mountain on Aug 31, 2011 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions
My crystal ball says
South Carolina, Arkansas, LSU, Alabama/
But my crystal ball doesn’t have a great track record.
Audemus jura nostra defendere
Every day we make it, we'll make it the best we can.
by animalcracker on Sep 1, 2011 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions
You might be correct about Arkansas.
They are always dangerous, but I think that they have a really talented team this year. I won’t predict against SoCar until I see them play-their QB situation is really tenuous, at best. LSU? We’ll see how they respond the bar-fight changing line up.
by Tiger on the mountain on Sep 1, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Regardless of expectations...
…I have been saying since Cam and Nick declared for the draft that I would be ECSTATIC if we went 8-4 with one win from each of the following Chinese menu columns: LSU/Florida and UGA/Bama.
Michael Val
(who says heck, I’d be happy 4-8 if we beat all four of the listed teams above!)
In the words of Kevin Scarbinsky, "If it’s Auburn against the world…good luck, world."
by Michael Val Hietter on Aug 30, 2011 10:03 PM CDT reply actions
Good analysis
Looks about right but my guess is game day coaching gets AU 10 wins.
by IrishTiger on Aug 31, 2011 8:44 AM CDT reply actions 1 recs
WAR DAMN EAGLE
I agree with Todd this will surprise yall. We have the best coaching staff in the country and a poor outcome is 9 wins…
Not that we ever have to defend ourselves against a troll...
…but thanks to you all for answering the Bammer above, folks—I have been out of commission for a while with the new job kicking my behind AND an email virus.
I probably shouldn’t dignify Tell William’s trolling comment with a response; however, just to be clear, and to dispel the accusations of “little brother syndrome” (and how the hell he came up with that, I don’t know), I’ll restate my throwaway line about going “4-8”….
Of course, I want to beat the three less-than-competitive out-of-conference teams. But I wouldn’t be disappointed with close losses in well-played, hard-fought games against Clemson, Ole Miss, Miss St., Arkansas, and South Carolina, if those teams are actually decent, and provided we gave our all and didn’t do anything stupid at the end to lose.
The four teams I named in my “Chinese menu” have special places in the cold, dark, nasty, better-left-unexplored cockles of my dark, black heart (Florida especially). Victories against those folks would be extremely pleasing for a variety of reasons. I refuse to see how “little brother syndrome” enters into that.
Michael Val
(who says I am NO ONE’S little brother—except to my older sister!)
In the words of Kevin Scarbinsky, "If it’s Auburn against the world…good luck, world."
by Michael Val Hietter on Sep 3, 2011 7:16 AM CDT reply actions
The phrase, "little brother syndrome",
like most linguistic constructs, can carry two levels of meaning — one which is defined by the intent of the person using it, and another which can be inferred by an individual hearing or reading the phrase.
That’s the funny thing about words. It’s all about contextuality. Our verbal and written communication has its share of words that appear to carry only one meaning, but which offer us more information, if we examine the underlying rhetorical conditions for that communication.
Take for example, “little brother syndrome”: when a regular ’Bama fan or some cowardly troll with a safety account that they use only every couple of months (see also: Tell William), it is mutually understood that Auburn is being accused of an inferiority complex fueled by a persistent, manifest jealousy of a rival program. This would be that former level of meaning that I referenced.
The latter?
Well, what have you noticed about pretty much every person that’s ever used that phrase in relation to the AU/UA rivalry? That they’re knuckle-dragging morons lacking the wit necessary to devise a better insult, or the intellect to construct a more compelling argument?
Whether it’s an obnoxious Texas fan in the A&M-to-SEC debate, or a ’Bama troll between the months of August and January, this is common to the phrase, in that it enables us to distinguish those special few imbeciles from the rest of the opposing fanbase that might otherwise consist of perfectly affable persons.
(cue image: the more you know)
And finally...
There are the morons that ReplyFail consistently. You’ll spot them by their replying immediately to their own comments.
Really gotta’ watch out for them.
(this was meant to be a response to MVH)
I figured that...
…and you probably have seen enough of my comments-under-comments as well! MVH
In the words of Kevin Scarbinsky, "If it’s Auburn against the world…good luck, world."
by Michael Val Hietter on Sep 3, 2011 5:02 PM CDT up reply actions

by 



















