Who's Your Doggie?  Georgia Officially Anointed Current Pre-Preseason Media Darling

Mon Apr 21, 2008 at 07:49:08 AM EDT

By War Eagle Atlanta
glg68@aol.com

Conference front-runner?
Seems like a trend that we can all relish in: SEC team finishes season on a roll, only loses a pair of conference games, and although fails to make it to Atlanta in December, wins their bowl game big, thus setting the table to be run to the title game for the following season .

We saw it with LSU after the 2006 season, in which they demolished Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl and were the hand-picked successors to Florida by the media as the upcoming champion in 2007. And now you're seeing it with Georgia, whose losses to South Carolina and Tennessee last year precluded them from playing in the title game, but propelled them into the Sugar to thoroughly trash an over-matched Hawaii team.  Starting to see the emerging trend now?

Heck, you can even draw parallels with the 2005 Florida team, whose 9-3 record in Urban Meyer's inaugural year wasn't bad, but didn't involve a Sugar Bowl appearance.  Nor did it involve a pre-season MNC nod for 2006--the Gators were ranked pre-season that year around an average of 6th.  But they went on to win it all anyway, giving the SEC it's second of three Mythical National Championships (MNC) in the new century.

But we're not even done with spring drills, you say. True enough, but the sports media these days never sleeps, and certainly does not like a void.  Just because college football isn't being played on the field, don't think for a minute that it isn't being played in the minds of coaches, fans, and the media alike.

Just like a Fortune 500 company these days doesn't have a CEO exiting stage left without a successor already being named, college football is rapidly coming to the point where they're not going to shut off the lights on the old season before they determine who the favorite for the next one will be. Hell, they're even starting to do it with head coaches--this 'coach-in-waiting' crap. Don't be surprised if they even start conducting exit polls outside the various bowl game venues so they can determine who the on-deck champion is going to be...

But a lot of giggling coming out of Athens here lately lets you know that the Dawgs are ready to have their day. Good for them. I think they're entitled to feel a little giddy. We Tigers probably shouldn't have much that we can say against them, being that we were in the same position going into the 2003 season, and we all know how that turned out. There's no team that benefits more from flying UNDER the radar than Auburn. That's how we like it--unexpected and under-appreciated. We never seem to live up to our lofty expectations anyway, so perhaps we can serve as a cautionary warning to the 2008 Dawgs.

But maybe we also serve as a little inspiration. You gotta ask yourself, "Why is the SEC getting so much love lately?" Everyone already knows that we're the toughest conference, right? Why has it taken them so long to recognize it?

I think a lot of the reason is that the media and the CFB powers-that-be feel guilty over Auburn having been left out of the MNC hunt in 2004 and are now bending over backwards to give deserving SEC teams every break and benefit of the doubt that they deserve. Of course, you have to factor in the superb competition in the conference, too, but at long last the SEC is being given its props. It sucks that it took a shafting of Auburn for everyone to recognize it, but at least it's time has come.

Florida at the end of the 2006 season is the first beneficiary. For sure, they don't get into the title game without a USC face plant to UCLA, and maybe an 11-1 SEC team is the natural choice anyway, but don't forget how strong the sentiments were to get a Michigan-Ohio State rematch for all the marbles. In my opinion, there's no way that a nascent Gator squad gets the call over Big Go Blue without a little extra caution and consideration from the media being exercised.

Then look at LSU last year--predicted to win it all. They shoot themselves in the foot twice, and almost shoot it four other times. Yet they win the SEC, and none of their losses are OOC. Couple that with the fact that virtually every other team lost near the end; and LSU gets the nod.

They're the first two-loss team EVER to get that chance. Think a two-loss team from almost any other conference gets the same opportunity?  Not a chance. The CFB powers were weighting those SEC losses a little differently than the rest...

Seem a little pre-ordained that LSU ended up where they were? Yea, maybe--I hate it when the media seemingly gets their way. There definitely was a lot of luck involved, but I think that LSU received supreme consideration, being the SEC champs.

And the growing trend seems to be that in a world without a playoff, perhaps the champion of the SEC deserves to automatically get a bid in the MNC title game. Call me crazy, but I think that's the way it's going. Give it a few more seasons and I'll know for sure.

So you Dawgs have a tough schedule out in front of you this season, perhaps the toughest of anyone.  But relax. Maybe you don't quite have to run the table. Facing the opponents you do in the conference you're in, even if you slip a little, maybe they'll cut you a little slack!

  • ::


Tags: Georgia a favorite for national championship run, Georgia looks to be the favorite in the SEC, War Eagle Atlanta, Auburn blogs, Track'em Tigers, com (all tags)

Comments Disabled | 6 comments


'
  • Extremely well said.... (none / 0)

    One other worthy note to mention and this is not to take any worth away from the SEC but who was the chairman of the BCS the last two years??  That is right, Mike Slive!!!  Who was his predecessor??  None other than Kevin Weiberg who was the Big 12 commisioner during the OU and Texas run of '04-'05 and '05-'06. And in case you are asking who the new (or return) coordinator is....it is John Swofford, commisioner of the ACC (previous coordinator from 2001-2003).  So will we see a mysterious run of Miami's, FSU's, V-Tech's, etc??  Not likely but stranger things have happened in the BCS as we all know!!!

    Just my humble opinion.....and again, this is not to deflate the strength of the SEC.  Like I said earlier this was a very good article.  Rather I just want to continue to bring to light that in recent history MNC contestants have followed the coordinators home conference.

    And then of course as CTT has pointed out there is the Heisman favorite theory/controversy.  But I will leave that for later!!!

    • Good point (none / 0)

      I knew that Florida and LSU happened on Slive's watch, but didn't know about Weiberg. Probably a coincidence, but an interesting one.  Conspiracy theories will abound, no doubt.

      I lost any/all respect for the Heisman when Peyton Manning got the shaft. It'll take another Auburn winner to get me stoked again...

  • Georgia is definitely a media darling (none / 0)

    But I can remember watching some of the BCS bowl games, where the announcers were all ready to give the numbers 1 and 2 slots for this upcoming season to Ohio State and Oklahoma (in whatever order) even though both of them were manhandled in their bowl games.

    Fact: Oklahoma has gone to a BCS bowl game in four of the past five seasons, and lost ALL FOUR, two by at least twenty points, and one to the WAC champion.

    Fact: Ohio State has been manhandled in two straight national championship games by SEC teams despite coming in as the #1 team in the BCS in both.

    Isn't it time that the sports media realized that these two jokers just don't belong in the top five year in and year out?

    Sorry to get off the subject of UGA, it just boils my blood.

  • What is this? Dawgsports.com? (none / 0)

    Personally, I have always admired the various posts, comments, etc. from the writer of this column.  To be sure, this is a finely written piece and I understand the overall point the article is making.

    However, this is an AUBURN blog.  I don't want to read about the chances of Georgia football, especially after our last two performances against them.  I don't want to see that ugly-a$$ bulldog on the splash page of an AUBURN blog.  I just don't understand why this is necessary on an AUBURN blog.  This is one of the biggest a$$-kissing articles I have ever read about UGA... on an AUBURN blog.

    Yet, some Auburn people believe that UGA people are our buddies, people to share a drink with and talk about how great SEC football is.  I call BS!

    Listen, I grew up in Atlanta.  I see and hear UGA people all the time and, trust me, they think very little of Auburn.  They hate us.  I guarantee the words  "inbred" and "hick" would be the primary words used to describe us by the obnoxious cretins in red and black.

    It's as if it is not OK for Auburn people to dislike all things UGA.  What's wrong with some flared tempers and some good-natured disrespect for the Bulldog Nation?  

    Some might say keep your friends close and your enemies closer.  I say with friends like these, who needs enemies when it comes to UGA.

    Is it me, or did we have our a$$es handed to us by the Dawgs twice in a row?  What about an article about what it is going to take to beat these clowns and prevent them from winning the conference championship?  Instead, a feel-good article about... GEORGIA's MNC chances on Track 'em Tigers.    

    Give me a break.  If I want a fluff piece about UGA football, I will go to dawgsports.com.  I am sorry to be so blunt to a true blue Auburn fan, but this article is too pro-Georgia and you should be called out on it.

    • Are you suggesting... (none / 0)

      ...that I return the stack of hundreds that Damon Evans gave me to write that fluff piece???

      There's nothing in that article that praises Georgia.  I just state matter of factly that they're the media darling so far in the pre-preseason. Certainly, you can't disagree with that assertion even if you don't agree with the choice.

      I looked at my calender before I wrote it.  It said April.  Not a whole lot of football news coming out of the Plains this time of year, or anywhere, for that matter.  I was making the mere observation that the media is seemingly starting to push SEC teams here of late. If you fail to grasp how that effects us, well, I can't connect the dots any better than that. There are other issues in CFB that although may not have a direct link to Auburn, affect us just the same.

      BTW, I'm a native Georgian, and I totally disagree with your comments about the perception of us by Georgia fans. I think we get our due respect out of Athens and it is possible to have an intense rivalry that doesn't get nasty. But don't think for a minute that we don't owe them a good clock-cleaning this November...

  • UGA can't do it... (none / 0)

    UGA has a really tough schedule this year.  They will be the LSU of 2006, the best team in the country with the hardest schedule in the coutnry.  UGA has to go TO AU, TO LSU, TO Az. St. and play UF at a neutral site.  Also, Tennessee will be better this year than last, because Crompton is better than Ainge, and oh by the way I'm not sure that Stafford is a great QB.

    I think UGA could easily lose two games and be runner up to Florida in the east this year, missing the MNC by just that much again.

    The SEC is just getting ridiculous hard...

Comments Disabled | 6 comments